Y F T ra n sf o A B B Y Y.c bu to re he C lic k he k lic C w. om w w w w rm y ABB PD re to Y 2.0 2.0 bu y rm er Y F T ra n sf o ABB PD er Y – 582.623 + 581.15 + 575.174.015.3 + 631.52 (SALIX VIMINALIS L.) (IN SITU) w. A B B Y Y.c (EX SITU) . (Salix L.) . (Salix viminalis L.). . . . . : , , , (Salix L.) – , , , , [6, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, ( Salix (2n=4x=76), (2n=12x=228); x=19 [21]. , , 18, 21, 23]. Salix 300…500 ) [15, 21]. : (2n=6x=114), (2n=2x=38), (2n=10x=190) (2n=8x=152), (2n=3x=57); – ( ( ), [4]. , , , ) . , , , [5, 8, 10]. Salix ( ), , , , , ( , ) , , . , , , , [2, 6, 7, 14, 17]. – » [19, 24, 26, 27, 30]. ) , 70 200 . . 25 8 2 (25 ) [11]. [11, 24]. « . , » . . , [27], . ( , . – ) . ( ) – , . , , ( , , . « » [16, 20]. , [25, 29, 31], 1.6.11. ) om Y F T ra n sf o A B B Y Y.c bu to re he C lic k he k lic C w. om w w w w rm y ABB PD re to Y 2.0 2.0 bu y rm er Y F T ra n sf o ABB PD er Y . ( (in situ): w. A B B Y Y.c ) 104 ( ). . , ( , ) , [9, 23]. , ) [1, 20]. , , (ex situ), , , [1]. , : ) [28]. 20…50% ( ) . : ( ), , . ( ) Vimen Dum. 1825 (Viminella Ser. 1824), (S. viminalis) [3, 5, 25, 27, 29, 31]. – Salix viminalis L. – ( .: , , ; eng.: basket willow, osier willow, silky osier) (2n=2x=38), . , ( ). . . (II – ). , . – . (<1 ). , , . . ( ) . . , , . 80...125 (45...160) , 10...15 (7...18) . , , . , . , , . 7...12 2...3 , ( ), . 4...6 [6, 7, 15, 17]. : , , , ), ( , ), ( . ), , , . , ( ) [15, 17]. – , , , ; [6, 7]. : S. pseudolinearis Nas., S. semiviminalis E. Wolf, S. serotina Pallas, S. strobilacea Nas., S. verviminalis Nas., S. gmelinii Pall. S. gmelinii Pall., , S. dasyclados [22]). : S. rossica Nas. ( ), S. schwerinii E. Wolf ( ) [13]. . . 1930. : '( . ), ' '( . ), ' -3' ' '( )( . [14, 20]). (S. viminalis f. culta hort.): S. viminalis var. lanceolata, S. viminalis var. gigantea, S. viminalis var. regalis. , , ' '( ) [17]. : S. viminalis × S. aurita (S. × fruticosa Döll.), S. viminalis × S. caprea (S. × smithiana Willd.), S. viminalis × S. cinerea (S. × holosericea Willd.), S. viminalis × S. purpurea (S. × rubra Huds.), S. viminalis × S. triandra (S. × undulata auct.), S. caprea × S. viminalis (S. × acuminata auct.), S. purpurea × S. viminalis (S. × forbiana auct.), S. purpurea × S. undulata (S. × suckatschiovii auct.), S. dasyclados × S. viminalis (S. × stipularis Sm.), S. triandra × S. viminalis (S. × molissima Ehrh.). S. dasyclados × S. viminalis [29, 31]. : , om Y F T ra n sf o A B B Y Y.c bu to re he C lic k he k lic C w. om w w w w rm y ABB PD re to Y 2.0 2.0 bu y rm er Y F T ra n sf o ABB PD er Y . ) – ( w. A B B Y Y.c - . ( , ) , [6]. . . ( ) ). S. viminalis (F0, vi 01 ) , 20.05.2001 . Salicetum triandro-viminalis (Tx. 1931) Lohm. 1952. (34,371874º ( ., 53, 220569º .). F0 ( ; – D3). – ( ), 2 , . , , , Y/X ( Y X). F0 ( ), , , . ( ) ( ). 2004 . . (Y/X=10,9…13,5), vi 0105 ( ) – F0 – vi 0102 ( ) (F1, vi 04 ) – : vi 0402 vi 0404 – (Y/X=4,8…5,5). . 2007 2009 . vi 0402) vi 0924 ( vi 0404). vi 0105 F2/b: vi 0722 ( . 2011 . F2/b vi 0722 vi 0924 – vi 0924 (Y/X=15,0…18,3). , (Y/X=6,4…6,5 Y/X=6,8…7,8), (Y/X=4,6…5,5 Y/X=5,2…5,3). ( ) ( , . 1–4; ( ), ). 10 . vi 0924x – 1 ( ( . 2), . 3), . vi 09243 4. , ( ) , ( ) (in situ). , , (ex situ) . . S. viminalis , . om Y F T ra n sf o A B B Y Y.c bu to re he C lic k he k lic C w. om w w w w rm y ABB PD re to Y 2.0 2.0 bu y rm er Y F T ra n sf o ABB PD er Y b d 1– ( a, b – vi 09245): Y/X=10,9…13,5; , c, d – . b 2– a – Y/X=6,4…6,5 ( : vi 07221); b – Y/X=6,8…7,8 ( vi 07222); . w. A B B Y Y.c om Y F T ra n sf o A B B Y Y.c bu to re he C lic k he k lic C w. om w w w w rm y ABB PD re to Y 2.0 2.0 bu y rm er Y F T ra n sf o ABB PD er Y w. A B B Y Y.c b 3– : a – Y/X=4,6…5,5 ( vi 09241); b – Y/X=5,2…5,3 ( vi 09242); . b 4– ( ,b– a – Y/X=15,0…18,3; a – vi 09243): . A comparative characteristic of genetic diversity of the willow (Salix L.) in nature and in culture is given. A system for selection of willows on the basis of inbreeding is described. Problems of taxonomy of basket willow (Salix viminalis L.) analyzed. Segregation on the morphology of the leaf blade in inbred families of basket willow is described. We prove a high genetic potential of natural populations of basket willow in the Bryansk forest array. The key words: energy plantations, basket willow, allelic diversity, inbreeding, backcrossing. 1. 2. 3. , . , Vimen / 4. , . , . . .: . .: , 1984. 101 . . , . . // : « », 2011. : . 11–22. . . . ». – , », 2003. 431 . . : 5. « : // . « , 2005. . 141–143. , – . (Salix L.) / . , . , . 2010 , . . : // om Y F T ra n sf o A B B Y Y.c bu to re he C lic k he k lic C w. om w w w w rm y ABB PD re to Y 2.0 2.0 bu y rm er Y F T ra n sf o ABB PD er Y , 2010. . 77–86. 6. 7. w. A B B Y Y.c , . .– : , 2003. 237 . , . : . – Saarbrücken: LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011. 182 . 8. , . ( Salix ). : . , 2005. 146 . 9. , . / . , . , . // – 2010: . V . . . – .1. – : , 2010. . 30–34. 10. , . / . , . // : . .– : , 2009. . 391–393. 11. , . « » / . , . // . 2011. 6. . 16–24. 12. , . . – .: , 2004. 217 . 13. , . Salix / . . 5. .– .: , 1936. . 24-216, 707-713. 14. , . , . – .: , 1952. – 168 . 15. , . . .: , 1968. 262 . 16. , . . .: . , 1980. 206 . 17. , . : ( , , .): / . , . . .: , 2009. – 200 . 18. , . / . , . // .– : « », 2011. – . 175–180. 19. , . i : i / . , . , . , . . .: , 2009. 80 . 20. , . / . . , . . , . . . .: , 2003. – 503 . 21. Argus G.W. Infrageneric Classification of Salix (Salicaceae) in the New World. – Systematic Botany Monographs. 1997. Vol. 52. 121 p. 22. Belyaeva, I. Tipification of Pallas names in Salix / I. Belyaeva, A. Sennikov // Kew Bulletin. 2008. Vol. 63. P. 272.87. 23. hmelar, J. Die Weiden Europas / J. hmelar, W. Meusel. Wittenberg–Lutherstadt: 1976. 143 s. 24. Fredga, K. Bioenergy: Opportunities and constraints / K. Fredga, K. Danell, K.H. Frank, D. Hedberg, S. Kullander // Energy Committee Report. 2008. June. 30 p. 25. Hanley, S. A genetic linkage map of willow (Salix viminalis) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers / S. Hanley, G.H.A. Barker, J.W. van Ooijen, C. Aldam, S.L. Harris, I. Ahman, S. Larsson, A. Karp // Theol: Appl. Genet. 2002. 105. . 1087–1096. 26. Heinsoo, K. Fine root biomass and production in a Salix viminalis and Salix dasyclados plantation / K. Heinsoo, E. Merilo, M. Petrovits, A. Koppel // Estonian Journal of Ecology. 2009. 58 (1). . 27–37. 27. McCracken, A.R. Interaction of willow (Salix) clones growing in mixtures // Ann. Appl. Biol. 1998. 132, Suppl. P. 54–55. 28. Möller, R. Crop platforms for cell wall biorefining: lignocellulose feedstocks / R. Möller, M. Toonen, J. van Beilen, E. Salentijn, D. Clayton. CNAP, University of York, 2007. 162 p. 29. Rönnberg-Wästljung, A.C. A genetic linkage map of a tetraploid Salix viminalis S. dasyclados hybrid based on AFLP markers / A.C. Rönnberg-Wästljung, V. Tsarouhas, V. Semerikov, U. Lagercrantz // Forest Genetics. 2003. 10(3). P. 185–194. 30. Smart, L.B. Genetic Improvement of Willow (Salix spp.) as a Dedicated Bioenergy Crop / L.B. Smart, K.D. Cameron // Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops / W. Vermerris (ed.). University of Florida – New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 2008. P. 347–376. 31. Weih, M. Genetic basis of phenotypic correlations among growth traits in hybrid willow (Salix dasyclados × S. viminalis) grown under two water regimes / M. Weih, A.C. Rönnberg-Wästljung, C. Glynn // New Phytol. 2006. 170. P. 467–477. . . , , [email protected] om