612.015:616.73/75 , , ., . " " . . » » - http://www.famous-scientists.ru «GE/Lunar» ( 4947 , : 1649 1649 ) 16 . , 1649 . , 18 5 : – , , 20 80 ( . ) 18 . , 20 , - , , 16 95% , – 92%. 30% – 41%. 11, 17 20%. 36% 80 - - . , (2000-2010 .), , . , – ( ) - . ( , . , . - ) , , , [3,4]. - , , , , - , , [1, 2]. . - - , . , , , : , - , - 16 70 . , 4947 2544 2403 - . 16-70 18-70 . 95%, – 92%. 21-25 . : : , , . 16-20 18- 14% ( <0,01), , 25% ( <0,01). – - 21-70 – 20 . 45 - – 51 - 56 . 46 , 80 . - « 30% ( <0,001), – 36% ( <0,001), 41% ( <0,001). – - » «Lunar» ( , ). , , , , , , , D. ( ( ), = L – (P+T), –L ( ), T – ( ). : ), P – , , , «GE /Lunar», ( enCoreTM2002 , , . ). ( ²) . - 16 . 21 (3%, ( >0,05)), – 7% ( <0,05), – 10% ( <0,05). 41 : 12% <0,05) , – 45% <0,05). 41 , – 46 , 51 . 80 ) 23% ( <0,01), – 29% <0,001), – 25% ( <0,001). . 21 . – 45 , – 51 , – 61 . 80 27% ( <0,001), – 32% ( <0,001), – 50% ( <0,001). , . 25 - Microsoft® Excel (2000). 21-25 . . . 16 - – 21-60 - : 11% ( <0,05) - <0,05), >0,2). 26-60 31-51 - 60 9% 3% - – 95%, 92%. 56 , , – 46 . 51 - – 80 . 80 , , 17% 14% 12% ( <0,05). - <0,01), <0,05), , . (21-60 - ) 23% ( <0,01), – 11% ( <0,05), – 7% ( =0,05). ( ) 66, 61 56 . 80 24% ( <0,001), – 28% ( <0,001), – 36% ( <0,001). . . 18 (96%). 94% ( =0,05), – 90% ( <0,05). 25-61 , 80 10% ( <0,05). 56 . 80 14% <0,05). 51 , 80 20% ( <0,01). . 18 98%, 96%, – 94%. 56 , 51 , – 46 . 80 11% ( <0,05), – 19% ( >0,01), – 28% >0,001). . 18 97%, - 10% ( <0,05), <0,001), – 25% – 38% ( <0,001). , . 18 : 56 , – 51 46 . 5% ( =0,05), – 11% ( <0,05), – 10% ( <0,05). 80 19% ( <0,01), – 18% ( <0,01), – 12% ( <0,05). . – 18 95%, 56 , 61 , . 80 14% ( <0,05). 18 93%. 51 , 61 . 80 19% <0,05). 46 , 51 , 80 29% ( <0,05). - – ±0,5%. - , , , , - , . 60 . - , ( 16 , 18 ) 95% , - 97%, 92%. – . - , 21-25 . - . , , - – . 51 ( - . . , , - , ) . 56-66 . - 80 . 30% , – – 36% 20%. - 41%. 11, 17 , , - . , . , 07-04-96033. , - 1. . : . III « . // . . , . 250- 94. , 2. ., . // 2005. . . - . – , . - . », . 2005. . ., . 1. . 58. 3. Langendonck L., Claessens A.L., Lysens R. // Ann Hum Biol. 2004. V. 31. 2. P. 228. 4. Baumgartner R.N., Stauber P.M., Koehler K.M. // Am J Clin Nutr. 1996. V. 63. 3. P. 365. MINERAL DENSITY OF THE SKELETAL BONES, MUSCULAR, CONNECTIVE AND FAT TISSUE MASS IN PEOPLE OF VARIOUS SOMATOTYPES IN AGE ASPECT Parfenova I.A., Sveshnikov A.A. The Russian G.A.Ilizarov centre of science «Regenerative traumatology and orthopedy» 4947 healthy habitants of Ural region were examined with dichromatic bone densitometer «GE/Lunar» (USA). Then they were divided according to somatic type: 1649 normosthenic, 1649 hypersthenic and 1649 asthenic persons. There were formed age groups in female from 16, in male adolescents from 18 to 20 years old with 1-year pace, over 20 up to 80 years old with 5years pace. It was evaluated how somatic type affects the mineral density of a skeleton, the mass of muscular, connective and adipose tissues. The mineral density in hypersthenic female adolescents was formed at the age of 16, in male – at the age of 18. In normosthenic and asthenic persons of the same age the mineral density was 95% and 92%. In hypersthenic women 80 years of age the mineral density was reduced by 30% from peak bone mass, in normosthenic – by 36% and in asthenic – by 41%. In men these values were 11, 17 and 20% pro tanto.