литра на английском

1.
Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence
and early adulthood / N. Eisenberg, A. Cumberland, I.K. Guthrie et al. //Journalof
Research on Adolescence.– 2005– V.15.– N3.– P.235–260.
Возрастные изменения в просоциальном поведении и моральных суждениях в
подростковом и раннем взрослом возрасте
2.
Bersoff,D.M. Explaining unethical behaviour among people motivated
to act prosocially / D. M. Bersoff // Journal of Moral Education - 1999. –V.28.–N.4.–
P.413-428.
Объяснение
неэтичного
поведения
людей,
мотивированных
действовать
просоциально
3.
Brady F.N. An empirical study of ethical predispositions / F.N.Brady,
G.E.Wheeler // Journalof BusinessEthics. – 1996.–V.15.– N.9.–P.927–940.
Эмпирическое исследование этических предрасположенностей
Coser L.The funktion of konflikt.Glencoe,1996
215. Darendorf R. Gesellschaft und Freiheit. Muenchen, 1985.
216. Emst-Michel Kienich Die Freien Waldorfschulen. 1990.
217. Ellis A. Rational-emotiv therapy // currentpsychotherapies. Jtascha. 1984. P.140-187.
218.
220. Psychologie de demain / Fraisse P. (air). P. 1982 142s.
221. Ryans D.E. Measurement and Prediction of Teacher Effectivenissin A.Anastasi. Tessting Problems in
Perspective.-Waschington, 1966.
222. Simpson J.A. Wood W (1992), Introduction. Where is the group in social psychology? An historicol
overview, in: S.Worchel, W.Wood J.A.Simpson, Group process and productivity, Newbury Park, Cal.Sage
Publications, 1-10.
223. Tajfel G. Human Groups and Sozial Categories; studies in sozial psycology. Cambrige University Press)
2002.
226. Structuring the Therapeutic Process: Compromisse with Chaos. London,1988
4.
Butterfield, K. D. Moral awareness in business organizations:
Influenceof issue-related and social context factors / K. D. Butterfield, L. K. Trevino,
G. R.Weaver.–Human Relations.– 2000 – V.53. – N.7.– P.981–1018.
5.
Clarkeburn, H. A test for ethical sensitivity in science/ H. Clarkeburn
//Journalof MoralEducation.–2002 – V.31. –N.4.– P.440–453.
6.
Dolgoff, R. Ethical decisions for social work practice. - 7th ed. /
R.Dolgoff, D. Harrington, F. M. Loewenberg. – Belmont, C.A.: Thomson
Brooks/Cole,2005.– 285p.
7.
Douglas,S.ClinicalDilemmasinPsychotherapy:ATranstheoreticalApproac
htoPsychotherapyIntegration/S.Douglas.–N.Y.:Hardcover,2005.–p.255
8.
Eisenberg,N.Emotion,regulation,andmoraldevelopment/N.Eisenberg//An
n.Rev.Psychol. – 2000. – V.51. – P.665–697.
9.
Erwin, W. J. Supervisor moral sensitivity. / Erwin, W. J. //
CounselorEducation and Supervision.– 2000. –V.40. – P.115–127.
10.
Ethical Ambiguities in the Practice of Child Clinical Psychology / С.
I.Mannheim, M. Sancilio, S. Phipps-Yonas // Professional: Research and Practice. –
2002.– V.33.– N.1. – Р.24–29.
11.
Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: Using vignettes as
aninstrument / P Hebert, E. M. Meslin, E. V. Dunn et al. // Journal of Medical Ethics.
–1990.– V.16.– N.3.– P.141–145.
12.
Giorgi,A.Statusofqualitativeresearchin
thehumansciences/A.Giorgi//Methods.– 1986. –V.1 –N.1.– P.29–62.
13.
Gottlieb,M.AvoidingExploitiveDualRelationships:ADecision-Making
Model/M.Gottlieb//Psychotherapy. – 1993.– V.30. –N.1.– P.41–48.
14.
Haidt,
J.
When
Morality
Opposes
Justice:
Conservatives
HaveMoralIntuitions that Liberals may not Recognize / Haidt J., Graham J. //Social
JusticeResearch.–2007.–V.20.–N.1.–P.98-116.
15.
Increasing ethical sensitivity to racial and gender intolerance in schools
:Development of the racial ethical sensitivity test. / M.M. Brabeck, L.A. Rogers,
S.Selcuket al.// Ethicsand Behavior.–2000. – V.10.– N.2.–P.119-137.
16.
Jordan, J. Taking the First Step Toward a Moral Action: A Review
ofMoral Sensitivity Measurement Across Domains // Journal of Genetic Psychology.
–2007.– V.168. – N.3.– P.323-359.
17.
Karcher,J.N.Auditors’abilitytodiscernthepresenceofethicalproblems. / J.
N. Karcher. // Journal of Business Ethics. – 1996 – V. 15. – P. 1033–1050.
18.
Kitchener, K.S. Foundations of ethical practice in research
andteachinginpsychology/K.S.Kitchener.–Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,2000.–
318p.
19.
Kohlberg, L. The relationship of moraljudgment to moral action.
L.Kohlberg, D. Candee //Essays on moral development / L. Kohlberg. - 1984:Vol.2.Thepsychologyofmoraldevelopment.- Р.498–581.
20.
Kolay,A.S.EthicalDilemmasExperiencedbyPsychologicalCounsellors
Working at Different Institutions and their Attitudes and Behaviours as aResponse to
These Dilemmas / A. S. Kolay // Educational Sciences: Theory andPractice.–V.12.–
N.3.– P.1806-1812.
21.
Lind,R.A.IdentifyingpatternsofethicalsensitivityinTVnewsviewers:
An
assessment of some critical viewing skills. / R. A. Lind, T. SwensonLepper,D.L.Rarick//JournalofBroadcasting&ElectronicMedia.–1998.–V.42.
–P.507–519.
22.
Morality in everyday life / W. Hofman, D. C. Wisneski, M. J.
Brandt,L.J.Skitka//Science.–2014.–V.345(6202).–P.1340-1343.
23.
Myyry, L. The role of value priorities and professional ethical training
inmoral sensitivity / L. Myyry, K. Helkama // Journal of Moral Education. – 2002. –
V.31– P.35–50.
24.
Owhoso,V.Mitigatinggender-
specificsuperiorethicalsensitivity:Whenassessinglikelihoodoffraudrisk/V.Owhoso//Jo
urnalofManagerialIssues.
–2002.–V.14.–P.360–374.
25.
Pope, K. Ethical Dilemmas Encountered by Members of the
AmericanPsychological Association: A National Survey /Pope K., Vetter
V.//AmericanPsychologist.– 1992.– V.47.– N.3.– P.397–411.
26.
Postconventionalmoralthinking:A neo-Kohlbergianapproach/J.Rest,
D.Narvaez,M.J. Bebeau,S.J.Thoma.-Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,1999. – 229р.
27.
Robin, D. P.The perceived importance of anethical issue as an
influenceon the ethical decision-making of ad managers / D. P. Robin, R. E.
Reidenbach, P. J.Forrest//JournalofBusinessResearch.– 1996. –V.35.– P.17–28.
28.
Sadler, T. D. Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution
ofsocio-scientific issues. / T. D. Sadler // Journal of Moral Education. – 2004. – V.33.
–P.339–358.
29.
Shaub, M. K. The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on
commitmentandethicalsensitivity. / M. K. Shaub, D. W. Finn, P. Munter, P.
//BehavioralResearchinAccounting.– 1993.– V.5.– P. 145–164.
30.
Smith, D. 10 ways practitioners can avoid frequent ethical
pitfalls / D.Smith//MonitoronPsycholodgy.– 2003.– V.34.– N.1.– Р.50.
31.
Sparks, J. R. Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity:
Conceptualization,measurement, and exploratory investigation / J. R.
Sparks, S. D. Hunt // Journal ofMarketing.– 1998. – V.62.– P.92–109.
32.
Spinelli, E. The existential-phenomenological paradigm / E.
Spinelli.
//HandbookofCounsellingPsychology–
2ed.//eds.R.Woolfe,W.Dryden,S.Srawbridge–
London:SAGEPublications,2003.–P.180–198.
33.
Swahcon,C.D.
acounselor
Ethics
thecounselor
/С.D.Swahcon//
Being
/eds.J.A.Brown,R.H.Pate.– Jr.Pacifi cGroveCA:Brooks.Cole,1983.P.47–65.
34.
Tjeltveit,A.Avoidingethicalmissteps/A.Tjeltveit,M.Gottlieb//M
onitoronPsychology.– 2012.–V.43. – N.4.– Р.68–74.
35.
Turiel,E.DevelopmentofChildren’sOrientationstowardMoral,S
ocial, and Personal Orders: More than a Sequence in Development / E.
Turiel //HumanDevelopment.–2008.–V.51.–N.1.–P.21–39.
198. Shaub, M. K. The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on
commitment and ethical sensitivity. / M. K. Shaub, D. W. Finn, P. Munter, P. //
Behavioral Research in Accounting. – 1993. – V. 5. – P. 145–164.
199. Smith, D. 10 ways practitioners can avoid frequent ethical pitfalls / D. Smith
// Monitor on Psycholodgy. – 2003. – V. 34. – N. 1. – Р. 50.
200. Sparks, J. R. Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization,
measurement, and exploratory investigation / J. R. Sparks, S. D. Hunt // Journal of
–
Marketing.
–
1998.
V.
62.
–
P.
92–109.
201. Spinelli, E. The existential-phenomenological paradigm / E. Spinelli. //
Handbook of Counselling Psychology – 2ed. // eds. R. Woolfe, W. Dryden, S.
Srawbridge
–
London:
SAGE
Publications,
–
2003.
P.180–198.
202. Swahcon, C.D. Ethics the counselor / С.D. Swahcon // Being a counselor
/ eds. J.A. Brown, R.H. Pate. – Jr. Pacifi c Grove CA: Brooks. Cole, 1983. P. 47–
65.
203. Tjeltveit, A. Avoiding ethical missteps / A. Tjeltveit, M. Gottlieb // Monitor on
Psychology.
–
2012.
–
V.
43.
–
N.
4.
–
Р.
68–74.
204. Turiel, E. Development of Children’s Orientations toward Moral, Social, and
Personal Orders: More than a Sequence in Development / E. Turiel // Human
Development. – 2008. – V.51. – N.1. – P. 21–39.
Gelso С.J., Carter J.A. The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy: components,
consequences and theoretical antecendents // The Counseling Psychologist, 1985. Vol. 13. P. 155243.
136. George R.L., Cristiani T.S. Counseling: Theory and Practice, 3 rd Ed., Enqle-wood Cliffs. N.J.:
Prentice-Hall, 1990.
137. Gilliland B.E., James R.K., Bowman J.T. Theories and Strategies in Counseling and
Psychotherapy. 2 nd Ed. Enqlewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1989.
138. Gladstein G.A. Understanding empathy: integrating counseling, developmental and social
psychology perspectives // Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1983. Vol 30. P.467-482.
139. Rogers C. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change // Journal
of Consultation Psychology, 1957. Vol. 21. P. 95-103.
140. Schneider K. Therapist's personal maturity and therapeutic success: how strong is the link?
//The Psychotherapy Patient. 1992. Vol. 8. N 3-4. P. 71-91.

169. Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in
adolescence and early adulthood / N. Eisenberg, A. Cumberland, I.K.
Guthrie et al. // Journal of Research on Adolescence. – 2005 – V.15. – N 3.
– P. 235–260.
170. Bebeau, M. J. Influencing the moral dimensions of dental practice. /
Bebeau, M. J. // Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and
Applied Ethics / J. R. Rest, D. Narváez (eds.). – L.: Erlbaum
Associates,1994. – Р. 121-146.
171. Bersoff, D.M. Explaining unethical behaviour among people
motivated to act prosocially / D. M. Bersoff // Journal of Moral Education 1999. – V.28. – N. 4. – P. 413-428.
172. Brady, F. N. An empirical study of ethical predispositions / F.N.
Brady,
G. E. Wheeler // Journal of Business Ethics. – 1996. – V. 15. – N.9. – P.
927–940.
173. Butterfield, K. D. Moral awareness in business organizations:
Influence of issue-related and social context factors / K. D. Butterfield, L.
K. Trevino, G. R. Weaver. – Human Relations. – 2000 – V. 53. – N.7. – P.
981–1018.
174. Clarkeburn, H. A test for ethical sensitivity in science / H. Clarkeburn
// Journal of Moral Education. – 2002 – V. 31. – N. 4. – P. 440–453.
175. Dolgoff, R. Ethical decisions for social work practice. - 7th ed. / R.
Dolgoff, D. Harrington, F. M. Loewenberg. – Belmont, C.A.: Thomson
Brooks/Cole, 2005. – 285 p.
176. Douglas, S. Clinical Dilemmas in Psychotherapy: A Transtheoretical
Approach to Psychotherapy Integration / S. Douglas. – N.Y.: Hardcover,
2005. – p. 255
177. Eisenberg, N. Emotion, regulation, and moral development / N.
Eisenberg // Ann. Rev. Psychol. – 2000. – V. 51. – P. 665–697.
178. Erwin, W. J. Supervisor moral sensitivity. / Erwin, W. J. // Counselor
Education and Supervision. – 2000. – V. 40. – P. 115–127.
179. Ethical Ambiguities in the Practice of Child Clinical Psychology / С.
I. Mannheim, M. Sancilio, S. Phipps-Yonas // Professional: Research and
Practice. – 2002. – V. 33. – N.1. – Р. 24–29.
180. Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: Using vignettes as
an instrument / P Hebert, E. M. Meslin, E. V. Dunn et al. // Journal of
Medical Ethics. – 1990. – V. 16. – N. 3. – P. 141–145.
181. Giorgi, A. Status of qualitative research in the human sciences / A.
Giorgi // Methods. – 1986. – V. 1 – N. 1. – P. 29–62.
182. Gottlieb, M. Avoiding Exploitive Dual Relationships: A DecisionMaking Model / M. Gottlieb // Psychotherapy. – 1993. – V. 30. – N. 1. – P.
41–48.
183. Haidt, J. When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral
Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize / Haidt J., Graham J. // Social
Justice Research. – 2007. – V.20. – N. 1. – P. 98-116.
184. Increasing ethical sensitivity to racial and gender intolerance in
schools : Development of the racial ethical sensitivity test. / M.M. Brabeck,
L.A. Rogers, S. Selcuk et al. // Ethics and Behavior. – 2000. – V. 10. – N.
2. – P. 119-137.
185. Jordan, J. Taking the First Step Toward a Moral Action: A Review of
Moral Sensitivity Measurement Across Domains // Journal of Genetic
Psychology. – 2007. – V. 168. – N. 3. – P. 323-359.
186. Karcher, J. N. Auditors’ ability to discern the presence of ethical
problems. / J. N. Karcher. // Journal of Business Ethics. – 1996 – V. 15. –
P. 1033– 1050.
187. Kitchener, K.S. Foundations of ethical practice in research and
teaching in psychology / K. S. Kitchener. – Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000. –
318 p.
188. Kohlberg, L. The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. L.
Kohlberg, D. Candee //Essays on moral development / L. Kohlberg. 1984:- Vol. 2.The psychology of moral development. - Р. 498–581.
189. Kolay, A. S. Ethical Dilemmas Experienced by Psychological
Counsellors Working at Different Institutions and their Attitudes and
Behaviours as a Response to These Dilemmas / A. S. Kolay // Educational
Sciences: Theory and Practice. – V. 12. – N. 3. – P. 1806-1812.
190. Lind, R. A. Identifying patterns of ethical sensitivity in TV news
viewers: An assessment of some critical viewing skills. / R. A. Lind, T.
Swenson- Lepper, D. L. Rarick // Journal of Broadcasting

& Electronic Media. – 1998. – V. 42.
– P. 507–519.
191. Morality in everyday life / W. Hofman, D. C. Wisneski, M. J. Brandt,
L.J. Skitka // Science. – 2014. – V. 345(6202). – P. 1340-1343.
192. Myyry, L. The role of value priorities and professional ethical training
in moral sensitivity / L. Myyry, K. Helkama // Journal of Moral Education.
– 2002. – V.31 – P. 35–50.
193. Owhoso, V. Mitigating gender-specific superior ethical sensitivity:
When assessing likelihood of fraud risk / V. Owhoso // Journal of
Managerial Issues.
– 2002. – V. 14. – P. 360–374.
194. Pope, K. Ethical Dilemmas Encountered by Members of the American
Psychological Association: A National Survey / Pope K., Vetter V. //
American Psychologist. – 1992. – V. 47. – N. 3. – P. 397–411.
195. Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach / J.
Rest,
D. Narvaez, M. J. Bebeau, S. J. Thoma. - Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,1999. –
229 р.
196. Robin, D. P.The perceived importance of anethical issue as an
influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers / D. P. Robin, R.
E. Reidenbach, P. J. Forrest //Journal of Business Research. – 1996. – V.
35. – P. 17–28.
197. Sadler, T. D. Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of
socio-scientific issues. / T. D. Sadler // Journal of Moral Education. – 2004.
– V.33. – P. 339–358.
135. Gelso С.J., Carter J.A. The relationship in counseling and
psychotherapy: components, consequences and theoretical antecendents // The
Counseling
Psychologist,
1985.
Vol.
13.
P.
155-243.
136. George R.L., Cristiani T.S. Counseling: Theory and Practice, 3 rd Ed., Enqlewood
Cliffs.
N.J.:
Prentice-Hall,
1990.
137. Gilliland B.E., James R.K., Bowman J.T. Theories and Strategies in
Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2 nd Ed. Enqlewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall,
1989.
138.
Gladstein
G.A.
Understanding
empathy:
integrating
counseling,
developmental and social psychology perspectives // Journal of Counseling
Psychology,
1983.
Vol
30.
P.467-482.
139. Rogers C. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality
change // Journal of Consultation Psychology, 1957. Vol. 21. P. 95-103.
140. Schneider K. Therapist's personal maturity and therapeutic success: how
strong is the link? //The Psychotherapy Patient. 1992. Vol. 8. N 3-4. P. 71-91.

Lopez D. F., & Little T. D. Children’s action-control beliefs and
emotional regulation in the social domain // Developmental Psychology
1996 №
32 P. 299-312.
Lundgren D. C., Schwab M. R. Perceived appraisals by others, selfesteem, and anxiety // Journal of Psychology 1977 Vol. 97 P. 205-213.
Moss R. H., Schaefer J. A. Life transitions and crises // Coping with
life crises. An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press. P. 3-28.
Paulhan I. Le concept de coping // Annee psychol. 1992 № 4 P. 315Pearlin L. I., Schooler C. The structure of coping / L. I. Pearlin,
C. Schooler // J. of Health and Social Behavior. 1978 Vol.19. P. 2-21.
Skinner E., Edge K. Reflections on Coping and Development across
the lifespan // International Journal of Behavioral Development 1998 №
22(2).
Spielberger C. D. Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research.
N.Y., 1972 Vol. 1 P. 24-55.
100 Vitaliano P. P. et al. Coping Profiles Associated With Psychiatric,
Physical Health, Work and Family Problems// Health Psychology 1990 №
9(3).
101 Zinbarg R. E., Barlow D. H., Hertz R. M. Cognitive-behavioral
approaches to the nature and treatment of anxiety dis-orders // Annual
Review of
Psychology.1992. Vol. 43 P. 235-267.

Ader R., Cohen N. Psychoneuroimmunology: conditioning and stress
// Annual review of psychology.1993. Vol. 44 P. 53-85.
Ayers T. S., Sandler I., West, S., & Roosa, M. W. (1996).
A Dispositional and Situational Assessment of Children's Coping: Testing
Alternative Models of Coping. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 923-958.
Berg C.A., Meegan S. P., & Deviney P.P. A social-contextual model
of coping with everyday problems across the lifespan // International
Journal of
Behavioral Development 1998 № 22(2). P. 231-237.
Frydenberg E. Beyond Coping. Meeting goals, visions and challenges.
— Oxford University Press, 2002 P. 272
Hobfoll S. E. (1996). Social Support: Will you be there when I need
you? In N. Vanzetti and S. Duck (eds.), A lifetime of relationships.
California:
Brooks / Cole Publishing Co.
Lazarus R. S. From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of
changing gutlooks / R. S. Lazarus //Annual Review of Psychology. – 1993
– Vol.
Lazarus R. S. Emotion and Adaptation. — New York: Oxford
University Press, 1991
1.
Allport F. The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal
of
Experimental
Psychology.
1920,
3.
2. Bernstein S. (Ed.). Explorations in group work: Essays in theory and
practice.
-Boston.
1973.
3. Cummins R. C., King D. C. The interaction of group size and task
structure in an industrial organization. Personal Psychology. 1973.
4. Dailey R. C. The effects of cohesiveness and collaboration on work
groups:
Group
and
Organization
Studies.
1977.
5. Davis J. H., Restle F. The analysis of problems and prediction of group
problemsolving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1963.
6. Ford D. L., Nemiroff P. M., Passmore W. A. Group decision-making
performanceas influenced by group tradition. Small group behavior. 1977,
vol.
8.
7. Gitovich R., Kovalchuk S. Learning Psychology in English. – Moscow,
2010. https://www.book.ru/book/905361
8. Goldman M., Dietz D., Mc Glynn. Comparison of individual and
groupperformance related to heterogeneous wrong responses, size and
patterns ofinteraction. Psychological Reports. 1968, vol. 23, No. 2.
9. Gorchakova E., Spiridonova N. English for psychologists - Voronezh,
2003. http://window.edu.ru/resource/069/40069/files/jun03042.pdf
10. Hoffman Ch., Hendrick H. Problem solving in different sized groups.
Personal
Psychology.
1971,
Vol.
24,
3.
11. Kanecar S., Neclakantan P. Group performance as a function of group
type and group composition. Journal of Social Psychology. 1976, Vol. 6,
No. 3. Kelley H. H., Thibaut J. W. Group problem solving. - In: Handbook of
Social
Psychology.
Vol.
4,
1969.
12. Roby Т. B. Small group performance. Chicago, 1968.
13. . Shifflet S. Toward a general model of group productivity. Psychological
Bulletin.
1979,
Vol.
86,
1.
14. Terborg J. R., Castor C., De Ninno J. N. A longitudinal field investigation
of the impact of group performance and cohesion. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology. 1976, Vol. 34, No. 5.
Sample
assessment
tools
for
each
type
of
assessment
can
be
found
at
http://moodle.pnzgu.ru
7. Educational, methodological, information and technical means provided for the
discipline
а) Teaching and learning materials:
1. Best J.B., Addison W.E. A Preliminary Study of Perceived Warmth of Professor and Student
Evaluations // Teaching of Psychology, V. 27, N 1. P. 60-62. – Win., 2000.
2. Brown D.T., Benson A. J., etc. A systemic view of higher education and professional
psychology: Implications of the Combined-Integrated model of doctoral training // Journal of
clinical psychology. V. 60, N 10, 2004. - New York, NY.
3. Filak V.F., Sheldon K.M. Student Psychological Need Satisfaction and College TeacherCourse Evaluations // Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental
Educational Psychology, V. 23, N. 3, P. 235-247. Jun., 2003.
b) Internet resources:
https://vk.com/away.php?to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.frontiersin.org%2Fjournals%2Fpsycholog
y&cc_key=
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education
c) Software:
- "Microsoft Windows" (DreamSpark subscription/Microsoft Imagine Standart); registration
number 00037FFEBACF 8FD7, contract No. SD- 130712001 dated 07/12/2013;
- freely distributed software: OpenOffice; Mozilla Firefox; Adobe Acrobat Reader.
d) Other material and technical means:
Name of special rooms and premises
for in-class and individual work
PSU lecture hall
PSU classroom
PSU classroom for individual work
Equipment of special rooms and premises for in-class
and individual work