See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308905636 Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil Article in Waste Management · September 2006 CITATIONS READS 80 5,871 8 authors, including: Rashid Miandad Dr. Abdul-Sattar Nizami University of Peshawar Government College University, Lahore 23 PUBLICATIONS 3,615 CITATIONS 272 PUBLICATIONS 12,806 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Mohammad Rehan Mohamed Barakat King Abdulaziz University King Abdulaziz University 163 PUBLICATIONS 8,168 CITATIONS 173 PUBLICATIONS 13,449 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Rashid Miandad on 25 June 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. SEE PROFILE Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Waste Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wasman Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil R. Miandad a,b, A.S. Nizami b,⇑, M. Rehan b, M.A. Barakat a, M.I. Khan c, A. Mustafa c, I.M.I. Ismail b, J.D. Murphy d,e a Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Centre of Excellence in Environmental Studies (CEES), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia d School of Engineering, University College Cork, Ireland e MaREI Centre, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Ireland b c a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 16 May 2016 Revised 19 September 2016 Accepted 20 September 2016 Available online xxxx Keywords: Municipal plastic waste Pyrolysis Polystyrene (PS) plastic Liquid oil Batch pyrolysis reactor a b s t r a c t This paper aims to investigate the effect of temperature and reaction time on the yield and quality of liquid oil produced from a pyrolysis process. Polystyrene (PS) type plastic waste was used as a feedstock in a small pilot scale batch pyrolysis reactor. At 400 °C with a reaction time of 75 min, the gas yield was 8% by mass, the char yield was 16% by mass, while the liquid oil yield was 76% by mass. Raising the temperature to 450 °C increased the gas production to 13% by mass, reduced the char production to 6.2% and increased the liquid oil yield to 80.8% by mass. The optimum temperature and reaction time was found to be 450 °C and 75 min. The liquid oil at optimum conditions had a dynamic viscosity of 1.77 mPa s, kinematic viscosity of 1.92 cSt, a density of 0.92 g/cm3, a pour point of 60 °C, a freezing point of 64 °C, a flash point of 30.2 °C and a high heating value (HHV) of 41.6 MJ/kg this is similar to conventional diesel. The gas chromatography with mass spectrophotometry (GC–MS) analysis showed that liquid oil contains mainly styrene (48%), toluene (26%) and ethyl-benzene (21%) compounds. Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was the world’s twelfth largest primary energy consumer in 2012 with a total energy consumption of 9 quadrillions British thermal units (Btu) (US-EIA, 2014; Anjum et al., 2016). The current electricity generating capacity of KSA is 55 GWe; which is estimated to surpass 120 GWe by 2032 (Royal Decree, 2010). The electricity demand in KSA is increasing by 8% per annum, of which 50% is only consumed in the residential sector (Farnoosh et al., 2014). Fossil fuels are the only source of energy in KSA (SEC, 2012; Rehan et al., 2016a). The Government has launched a special program; King Abdullah City of Atomic and Renewable Energy (KACARE) to generate about Abbreviations: CO, carbon monoxide; HDPE, high density polyethylene; HHV, higher heating value; KACARE, King Abdullah City of Atomic and Renewable Energy; KSA, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; LDPE, low density polyethylene; MSW, municipal solid waste; NOx, oxides of nitrogen; PE, polyethylene; PP, polypropylene; PS, polystyrene; RDF, refuse derived fuel; SWM, solid waste management; TGA, thermogravimetric analyzer; TIC, total ion chromatogram; WTE, waste-to-energy. ⇑ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (A.S. Nizami). half of the energy (corresponding to a capacity of 72 GWe) from renewable sources such as solar, nuclear, wind, waste-to-energy (WTE) and geothermal by 2032 (KACARE, 2012; Nizami et al., 2015a; Demirbas et al., 2016a). KSA is one of the major plastic producer country in the world with annual plastic production of around 6 million metric tons (Nizami et al., 2015b; Khan and Kaneesamkandi, 2013). The average life span of about 40% of the consumed plastic in KSA is less than a month (Siddiqui and Redhwi, 2009). As a result, it is the second largest waste stream (17.4%) of total generated MSW in KSA (Nizami et al., 2015c). Moreover, excessive quantities of plastic waste are produced due to serving of meals in disposable plastics to millions of religious pilgrims and visitors, coming every year to KSA (Nizami et al., 2016). All of the collected MSW (around 15 million tons per year) including plastic waste is untreated and disposed to landfills (Khan and Kaneesamkandi, 2013). The clogging effects and the slow biodegradable nature of plastics with toxic additives and dyes are an added environmental burden through landfills and landfill operation (Miandad et al., 2016a). Worldwide, there are different plastic waste management techniques such as reducing, reusing, WTE, mechanical and chemical http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 0956-053X/Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 2 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx recycling and landfilling (Sriningsih et al., 2014; Sadef et al., 2015; Miandad et al., 2016b,c). Mechanical recycling methods such as sorting, grinding, washing and extrusion can recycle only 15–20% of all plastic waste (Ashworth et al., 2014). Combustion and landfilling of plastic waste results in air and waterborne pollutants (Ouda et al., 2016; Rahmanian et al., 2015; Eqani et al., 2016). Chemical recycling of plastic waste through hydrolysis, methanolysis, and glycolysis (Sinha et al., 2010) along with WTE technologies such as gasification, pyrolysis, refuse derived fuel (RDF) and plasma arc gasification are seen as preferable and as such are the subject of more scientific attention in recent years (Miandad et al., 2016a,b). The pyrolysis process converts organic materials including plastic waste into energy (liquid oil) and value-added product (char) (Bartoli et al., 2015; Rathore et al., 2016; Demirbas et al., 2016b). The process can be carried out by using different types of reactor such as tube reactor (Miskolczi et al., 2009), rotary kiln reactor (Li et al., 1999), microwave reactor (Undri et al., 2011; Undri et al., 2013), fixed bed reactor (Ringer et al., 2006), semi batch reactor (Lopez et al., 2011), and batch reactor (Syamsiro et al., 2014). Batch and semi-batch reactors are widely used at laboratory scale due to their easy operation, simple design, and safety point of view (Almeida and Marques, 2016; Chen et al., 2014; Ates et al., 2013). However, for fuel or monomer production at commercial scale, continuous pilot reactors such as fluidized bed and spouted bed reactors are used with continuous plastic feeding (Artetxe et al., 2015; Mo et al., 2014; Jung et al., 2013; Aguado et al., 2003). The factors affecting the yield and quality of produced liquid oil are temperature, reaction time, heating rate, particle size, feedstock composition and moisture content (Rehan et al., 2016b; Tröger et al., 2013; Nizami et al., 2016; Miandad et al., 2016d). The scientific literature shows that the pyrolysis studies mostly used either pure/ virgin plastic (Borsodi et al., 2011) or processed plastic types as a feedstock (Siddiqui and Redhwi, 2009). For instance, Syamsiro et al. (2014) used industrial manufactured granules of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and polystyrene (PS) as feedstock. Lerici et al. (2015) and Lopez et al. (2011) used pellets of commercial polymers of different plastic such as low density polyethylene (LDPE), HDPE, polypropylene (PP) and PS as feedstock. However the interest in pyrolysis of municipal plastic waste, especially in PS waste has gained significant attention in recent years (Bartoli et al., 2015; Lerici et al., 2015; Adnan and Jan, 2014; Frediani et al., 2014; Mo et al., 2014; Undri et al., 2014a). The focus of these studies was mainly to increase the quantity of produced liquid oil. The most frequent reported analysis of pyrolytic liquid oil involved GC–MS to establish the composition of the produced liquid oil (Kumar and Singh, 2011; Syamsiro et al., 2014; Sarker et al., 2012; Onwudili et al., 2009; Undri et al., 2015). However, the effect of process parameters on the quality of liquid oil characteristics, including viscosity (dynamic and kinematic viscosity), density, high heating value (HHV), flash point, and cold flow properties such as pour point, and freezing point and their comparison with conventional diesel is seldom studied (de Marco et al., 2009; Bartoli et al., 2015, 2016; Lee, 2007; Lee et al., 2015; Lopez et al., 2011), which was the focus of this research. Moreover, the recovery of styrene from PS waste using pyrolysis process and its potential application has been discussed in detail. In KSA, neither WTE facilities exist to convert any waste into energy (Nizami et al., 2016), nor has the plastic waste been characterized for its potential role as an energy recovery feedstock (Nizami et al., 2015a; Miandad et al., 2016c). The effect of temperature and reaction time on the yield and quality of liquid oil from a pyrolysis process was investigated. Furthermore, the produced liquid oil has been characterized for its chemical composition, dynamic and kinematic viscosities, density, flash point, HHV and cold flow properties. On the basis of these characterization results, the potential of liquid oil for the recovery of styrene, and generation of energy or as a source of transport fuel was discussed in detail. In addition, the potential of char was highlighted for various environmental applications. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Feedstock preparation The plastic waste in the form of disposable plates was collected from different canteens and hotels of Jeddah city and used as a process feedstock. Most of the food items are usually served in these plastic plates, which are primarily PS plastic. The samples were washed and dried in an oven to remove the impurities and moisture content. After washing and drying, the feedstock was shredded into small pieces with an average size of about 5 cm2. 2.2. Reactor startup A small pilot scale batch pyrolysis reactor was commissioned and used for the conversion of plastic waste into liquid oil and char (Fig. 1). The reactor has 20 L capacity and is made of stainless steel and covered with a loop of an electric heater, which allows a maximum temperature of 600 °C. A tube type condenser coupled with a water chiller is installed at the end of the reactor. The detailed reactor characteristics are given in Table 1. Organic vapors produced in the heating chamber were condensed into liquid oil. The condensed organic vapors were collected at the bottom of the system, while the uncondensed products in the form of gases coming from same liquid oil pipe were exhausted from the reactor (Fig. 1). 2.3. Experimental setup In all of the experiments, 1000 g of feedstock was used. The heating chamber of the pyrolysis reactor was heated at a rate of 10 °C per min to achieve the set temperature. The feedstock was converted into organic vapors, which were condensed into liquid oil after passing through the condenser and collected in the collection tank at the bottom. The temperature of the condenser chamber was kept below 10 °C using a LabTech water chiller with coolant flowrate of 30 L/min to achieve the maximum condensation of organic vapors. Reaction time of each experiment was counted from the first drop of liquid oil produced. The residue (char) at the end of each experiment was collected from the heating chamber after allowing the system to cool down to room temperature. After finishing each experiment, a mass balance of pyrolysis products was established through weighing of liquid oil and char quantities by using a standard digital balance and the remaining weight percentage to make up to 100% was all assumed to be gas product. 2.4. Analytical methods The feedstock and process products (liquid oil and char) were characterized by following the standard ASTM and APHA methods (Dezuane, 1997; APHA, 1998). TGA of PS plastic was carried out by a Mettler Toledo TGA (SDTA851) to assess the optimum process temperature and reaction time by following the feedstock’s thermal behavior under control conditions. TGA analysis was carried out using 10 lg sample poured into an aluminum oxide crucible, and heated at a rate of 10 °C per min from 25 to 900 °C under nitrogen flow at a constant rate of 50 ml/min. The liquid oil viscosities (kinematic and dynamic), density, pour point, and freezing point Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 3 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Pyrolysis Reactor Control Panel Condenser Water Chiller Oil Collector Fig. 1. Pilot scale batch pyrolysis reactor. Table 1 Reactor components. Reactor components Features Height of heating tank Diameter of heating tank Reactor capacity for feedstock Length of condenser Diameter of condenser Maximum temperature 360 mm 310 mm 20 L 860 mm 147 mm 600 °C were measured to compare the fuel characteristics with conventional diesel. For pour, and freezing points, AWD-12 Pour Point Tester was used with temperature of -10 °C for one tank (left tank) and the temperature of 56 °C for other tank (right tank). The sample was poured in the sample tube up to the mark. The sample was first put in the left tank till the temperature reduces to 0 °C and then transferred to the tank on the right side. The sample tube was taken out periodically from the tank after every 2 °C decrease in temperature to observe the flow by holding the tube horizontally for 4 s. This process was continued until the pour point and freezing point were reached. For density measurement, a portable density meter (DMA 35 from Anton Paar) was used, which was first calibrated with distilled water and then rinsed with acetone and allowed to dry between each sample, before taking the next measurements. A Discovery Hybrid Rheometer (HR1 from TA instruments) was used to measure the dynamic viscosities of the liquid oil with a 40 mm parallel plates geometry. A small amount of the liquid oil sample was placed on the bottom horizontal plate. The upper 40 mm plate was lowered at a controlled rate so that the sample was sandwiched between the two plates. The temperature was set to 40 °C and the shear rate range was set between 1 and 500 1/s. The rheometer was first calibrated using viscosity standard liquid followed by actual liquid viscosity measurements. Bomb calorimeter and flash point were used to assess the HHV and flash point of produced liquid oil by following the ASTM D 240 and ASTM D 93 methods respectively. The produced liquid oil was also analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrophotometry (GC–MS) using a Hawlett-Packard HP 7890 with a 5975 quadrupole detector. The GC has a capillary column with 30 m length and 0.25 mm diameter, which was coated with 0.25 lm thick film of 5% phenylmethypolysiloxane (HP-5). Initial temperature for the oven was set to 50 °C for a time interval of 2 min and then increased to 290 °C at 5 °C per min with an isothermal held for 10 min. The temperatures of ion source and transfer line were kept at 230 °C and 300 °C respectively and the splitless injection was used at 290 °C. The data was attained in the full-scan mode between m/z 33 and 533 and a solvent interval of 3 min was used. Chromatographic peak were recognized by means of NIST08s mass spectral data library based or by reaction times using standard compounds. The percentages of the peaks were calculated from total ion chromatogram (TIC) peak area. The percentage of produced gases was calculated by the difference between the feedstock amount and weight of products (liquid oil and char). 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Effect of temperature on liquid oil yield Experiments were carried out at three different temperatures (400, 450 and 500 °C) to investigate the effect of temperature on the yield and quality of produced liquid oil. After determination of optimum temperature, experiments were carried out at three different reaction times (60, 75 and 120 min) to investigate the effect on the feedstock decomposition and liquid oil. The purpose of using different temperature and reaction time was to find the optimum temperature and reaction time for pyrolysis of PS waste. The aim of experiments at 60 min reaction time was to examine the rate of decomposition at lower reaction time to minimize the intensive energy demands of the process. Whereas, the aim of experiments at 120 min was to achieve maximum decomposition of feedstock and to find out the effect of longer reaction time on the composition and quality of liquid oil and the production of char. Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 4 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx The TGA results showed a single step decomposition of PS plastic, where its decomposition started at 400 °C and reached its maximum decomposition point of 91% at 450 °C (Fig. 2). Further increase in temperature from 450 °C up to 650 °C showed only another 4–5% sample weight loss, completing the degradation of plastic with some residue (char) leftover. As more than 91% decomposition was achieved at up to 450 °C in the TGA experiment, it may be stated that 450 °C is an optimum process temperature for converting PS plastic waste into liquid oil using pyrolysis technology. Similar phenomena can be observed in the DTA (Fig. 2A) curve, where an endothermal peak is obvious, attributed to the decomposition of the PS plastic. The onset melting temperature can be noticed at around 330 °C, melting peak at around 420 °C and melting offset at around 480 °C. The variation in temperature at 75 min reaction time using the batch pyrolysis reactor also gave different yields of liquid oil (Fig. 3). At lower temperature (400 °C), the char yield was highest (16%), while the gases yield was 8% and the liquid oil yield was 76%. While, at higher temperature (500 °C) the gases yield was highest (16.8%) and the char yield was lowest (4.5%). The maximum liquid oil yield (80.8%) was achieved at 450 °C. TGA analysis also confirmed the 450 °C was the optimum temperature, but with higher maximum liquid oil yield (91%) than from this pyrolysis reactor (80.8%). This may be explained by the controlled conditions and very small scale of TGA experiment in comparison to the pyrolysis reactor system. The yield of produced liquid oil, especially the styrene yield increased with an initial increase in temperature and time, and after a certain temperature and time the oil yield started to decrease (Figs. 3 and 4). Jung et al. (2013) and Mo et al. (2014) explained this phenomenon that after achieving optimum temperature, some secondary reactions such as polyaromatic formation reactions are started during PS pyrolysis, which decrease the liquid oil and styrene yield. While, the phenomenon of increased gases production at higher temperature was explained by Lopez et al. (2011), de Marco et al. (2009), and Artetxe et al. (2015) that the strong cracking of C-C bonds at higher temperature increases the production of lighter hydrocarbons with short carbon chain compounds. Moreover, according to Li et al. (1999), Hernández et al. (2007) and Lopez et al. (2011), temperature lower than 450 °C increases the char and decreases the liquid oil yield and temperature in excess of 500 °C increases the gases and lowers the liquid oil yield. 3.2. Effect of reaction time on liquid oil yield The effect of reaction time on the liquid oil yield was studied against the optimum temperature of 450 °C at 60, 75 and 120 min (Fig. 4). The results showed insignificant difference in liquid oil production between the 75 and 120 min reaction times. The 75 min reaction time produced the maximum liquid oil yield of 80.8% as compared to 80.7% for a reaction time of 120 min. The char production was higher for a reaction time of 75 min as compared to 120 min (6.1 versus 5.3%). It can be stated that the extra reaction time shows similar yield for oil and char as 75 min reaction time. Thus 75 min is suggested as the optimum reaction time. The lowest reaction time (60 min) produced more char and less liquid oil, suggesting that a 60 min reaction time is insufficient to convert the feedstock to liquid oil at maximum conversion efficiency. Similar results were observed and reported by Lopez et al. (2011) and Lee (2007) on the yield of liquid oil with different reaction times. However, the effect of reaction time on pyrolysis is also one of the functions of the reactor dimensions and the heat transfer rate from the heating elements to the PS feedstock within the reactor (Jung et al., 2013; Ringer et al., 2006). Therefore, the reaction time may change with other reactor configurations, especially of a continuous flow reactor, which would be the type of reactor that are mostly used in industrial application of the pyrolysis process (Chen et al., 2014; Miandad et al., 2016a,b). 3.3. Characteristics of liquid oil The produced liquid oil was analyzed for various parameters (Figs. 5 and 6). The dynamic viscosity of liquid oil was found to be in the range of 1.66–3.02 mPa s from all studied conditions. The value of 1.77 mPa s was observed for the liquid oil produced at optimum conditions of 450 °C for 75 min (Fig. 5a). This is in agreement with the value of 2.49 mPa s as reported by Wongkhorsub and Chindaprasert (2013). The variation in the values of dynamic viscosity depends on the structure and composition of feedstock and liquid oil (Ates et al., 2013). According to Williams and Williams (1999) and Siddiqui and Redhwi (2009), liquid oil produced from PS plastic is a less viscous oil, similar to the results of this study (Table 2) (Syamsiro et al., 2014; Wongkhorsub and Chindaprasert, 2013). GC–MS analysis showed that compounds produced from the pyrolysis of PS plastic contained shorter carbon chains (Figs. 7 and 8). It is also interesting to note that dynamic viscosity range of 1.66–3.02 mPa s observed in this study is also in agreement with the range of 1–4.11 mPa s for conventional diesel. Fig. 2. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) of PS plastic feedstock (embedded figure A represents Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) curve). Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 5 Fig. 3. Effect of reaction temperature on pyrolysis liquid oil, char and gas product yields at 75 min of reaction time. Fig. 4. Effect of reaction time on pyrolysis liquid oil, char and gas product yields at 450 °C. Kinematic viscosity is one of the fuel properties, which dictates the spray pattern and atomization of injected fuel in a combustion chamber. High viscous oil gives poor atomization in the engine oil and thus leads to poor engine performance. Moreover, high viscous oil has less fluidity in cold temperatures (in winter); this adversely affects the operation of the fuel injector on engine startup due to poor atomization of fuel spray (Kim et al., 2009; Mohan et al., 2006). In this study, the kinematic viscosities of liquid oil were found to be 2.67, 1.92 and 3.24 mPa s at temperatures of 400, 450 and 500 °C respectively (Fig. 5b). Syamsiro et al. (2014) and Panda and Singh (2013) reported kinematic viscosity of 1.74 cSt for pyrolysis oil from polyethylene (PE) bag, 2.32 cSt from HDPE and 2.18 cSt for PP plastic. According to Syamsiro et al. (2014), liquid oil produced from the pyrolysis of plastic has a lower kinematic viscosity than diesel fuel due to the presence of a high fraction of gasoline and a low fraction of heavy oil. However, the kinematic viscosity range of 1.92–3.24 cSt found in this study is similar to the range of 2.0–5.0 cSt for conventional diesel (Table 2). Kinematic viscosity also plays a vital role in the lubrication of engines especially for rotary distributer injection pumps (Hansen et al., 2005). Lower fuel kinematic viscosity can lead to leakage at the injector, resulting in poor engine performance (Syamsiro et al., 2014). Density is an important parameter for any petroleum product. The produced liquid oil had densities of 0.94 g/cm3, 0.92 g/cm3 and 0.93 g/cm3 obtained at temperatures of 400, 450 and 500 °C respectively (Fig. 5c). This range of density is in line with the reported range of pyrolysis liquid oil densities using different feedstocks (Panda and Singh, 2013; Wongkhorsub and Chindaprasert, 2013; Sharma et al., 2014; Syamsiro et al., 2014; Undri et al., 2014b). Moreover, this range of density is little higher than naturally produced commercial diesel (0.81–0.87 g/cm3), as reported by Syamsiro et al. (2014). HHV is one of the most important characteristics of fuels. According to Saptoadi and Pratama (2015), fuels with higher HHV are needed in less quantity to perform the same function by fuels with lower HHV. The liquid oil produced from PS plastic at 400, 450 and 500 °C had HHV of 37.48, 41.60 and 41.58 MJ/kg respectively (Fig. 6). Kamal and Zainuri (2015), reported that increase in temperature (425–900 °C) increased the HHV of pyrolytic oil (41.87–46.84 MJ/kg), which is in agreement with our results. Moreover, the produced liquid oil had slightly lower HHV to conventional diesel (43.06 MJ/kg) (Kamal and Zainuri, 2015). Saptoadi and Pratama (2015), reported that since pyrolytic oil has slightly lower HHV then kerosene oil, it can be used with or without blending with kerosene oil. Cold flow properties are also very important features of any fuel for an operational point of view. These properties include cloud point at which temperature crystals start to form in liquid causing Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 6 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Fig. 5. Effect of reaction temperature on pyrolysis liquid oil characteristics (a) dynamic viscosity, (b) kinematic viscosity (c) density, (d) flash point, (e) pour point, (f) freezing point and (g) HHV. cloudiness and pour point at which temperature fuel becomes semi solid and loses its flow characteristics (Hansen et al., 2005; Gardy et al., 2014). The pour and freezing points of the produced liquid oil were found to be quite low, ( 18 to 19 °C) and ( 30 to 65 °C) respectively (Figs. 5 and 6). This is of increased importance in areas where cold temperatures are experienced during Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 7 Fig. 6. Effect of reaction time on pyrolysis liquid oil characteristics (a) dynamic viscosity, (b) kinematic viscosity (c) density, (d) flash point, (e) pour point, (f) freezing point and (g) HHV. winter. Moreover, according to Robert (2011), Bartoli et al. (2015) and Isioma et al. (2013), any fuel whose pour point is high will make wax if left for a longer period of time, blocking the filter and thus creating problems in engine startup. The GC–MS analysis showed that the same aromatic compounds were found in the produced liquid oil but in different com- positions at different temperatures and reaction times (Figs. 7 and 8). Toluene, ethyl-benzene and styrene were found to be about 95% (by area) in all three samples produced at three different process temperatures. Styrene was found in more abundance than the other two compounds, starting from 39 and rising to 48% (at 400 °C and 450 °C respectively). The maximum value of 48% was Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 8 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Table 2 Comparison of present study liquid oil with conventional diesel. Parameters Units Our results Conventional diesel Reference Dynamic viscosity Density @15 °C Kinematic viscosity @ 40 °C Pour point Flash point mPa s g/cm3 cSt °C °C 1.66–3.02 0.92–0.94 1.92–3.24 ( 18)–( 60) 28.1–30.2 1–4.11 0.815–0.870 2.0–5.0 Max 18 Min 55–60 Wongkhorsub and Chindaprasert (2013) Syamsiro et al. (2014) Syamsiro et al. (2014) Syamsiro et al. (2014) Syamsiro et al. (2014) tion of styrene along with an increase in production of toluene and ethylene benzene 60 Toluene Ethyl-benzene 48% Area (%) 50 48% 3.4. Potential applications of liquid oil and char 39% 40 30 Styrene 28% 28% 26% 20 26% 21% 21% 450 500 10 0 400 Pyrolysis reaction temperature (°C) Fig. 7. GC–MS analysis showing the effect of temperature on composition of liquid oil at 75 min of reaction time, (only the main products are reported). 60 Toluene Ethyl-benzene Area (%) 50 40% 40 30 Styrene 48% 39% 31% 30% 26% 26% 25% 21% 20 10 0 60 75 120 Pyrolysis reaction time (min) Fig. 8. GC–MS results showing the effect of reaction time on composition of liquid oil at 450 °C, (only the main products are reported). achieved at optimum temperature (450 °C) and reaction time (75 min) (Figs. 7 and 8). Various other studies also reported the similar results that styrene, toluene and ethylene benzene were the main compounds produced from PS waste (Jung et al., 2013; Undri et al., 2013, 2014a; Frediani et al., 2014; Artetxe et al., 2015). Onwudili et al. (2009) reported that there is no direct production of toluene and ethyl-benzene from the plastic waste feedstock, however they may be produced by the reaction of styrene itself. Production of styrene was effected by temperature: increased temperature increased styrene production with maximum production at 450 °C. Beyond 500 °C it is reported that further increase in temperature leads to a decrease in styrene production with an increase in the production of toluene and ethyl-benzene (Demirbas, 2004; Onwudili et al., 2009). Aguado et al. (2003), Artetxe et al. (2015) and Bartoli et al. (2015) explained this phenomenon that styrene goes under further decomposition at high temperature (from 500 to 600 °C) that result in low produc- In KSA, plastic waste (the second largest waste stream in MSW at 17.4% by mass), has potential to be converted into liquid oil and char. The results of kinematic viscosity, dynamic viscosity, flash point, density, freezing point, pour point and HHV of pyrolysis liquid oil (Figs. 5 and 6) were found to be similar to that of conventional diesel (Table 2). Different researchers used produced liquid oil individually as a source of energy or after blending with diesel in the ratio of 20% and 40% (Rehan et al., 2016b; Miandad et al., 2016a,b; Oasmaa and Czernik 1999). According to Kaustav (2014), diesel blended with pyrolytic liquid oil of up to 20% showed similar efficiency to conventional diesel in terms of its energy, NOx and CO emissions. According to Lee et al. (2015) the use of liquid oil in a diesel engine is a promising way to generate electricity. Wongkhorsub and Chindaprasert (2013) directly injected the liquid oil produced from plastic and tire waste into multi-purpose agriculture diesel engine. However, produced liquid oil especially from PS waste should be upgraded or blended with conventional diesel as it contains high aromatic contents, as can be seen from this study results (Figs. 7 and 8). According to Jung et al. (2013) and Artetxe et al. (2015), the thermal decomposition of PS waste produces mainly styrene, toluene, and ethylene benzene along with some others styrene monomers. Recovered styrene from the pyrolysis oil of PS waste can be used as a chemical source in industries for polymerization of PS polymer (Achilias 2007; Frediani et al., 2012). Moreover, polyhydroxyalkanoate a biocompatible and biodegradable plastic can be produced from pyrolysis oil of PS waste (Nikodinovic-Runic et al., 2011). Char from pyrolysis of HDPE, PS and tire waste had a calorific value of 23.09, 36.29 and 32 MJ/kg respectively (Syamsiro et al., 2014; Undri et al., 2013). Jindaporn and Lertsatitthanakorn (2014) prepared the briquettes after crushing the char produced from pyrolysis of HDPE and used it for boiling of one liter water; 1 kg of prepared briquettes took 13 min to boil the water. In addition, char can be used as a source of energy for boiler or as a feedstock for activated carbon (Frediani et al., 2012). The thermal activation of char produced from HDPE waste at 900 °C for three hours increased its surface area and reduced the pore size (Lopez et al., 2011). The activated char in the form of activated carbon can be used for industrial and municipal wastewater purification from heavy metal and disinfecting by-products and toxic organic compounds (Jindaporn and Lertsatitthanakorn, 2014). For instance, the upgraded char of PS, PP, PE and tire waste showed significant adsorption of methylene blue dye (3.59–22.2 mg/g) from wastewater (Bernando, 2011). 4. Conclusions A small pilot scale batch pyrolysis reactor has been used to convert PS plastic waste into liquid oil. The effect of process temperature and reaction time on the quality and yield of liquid oil was studied in detail. The results showed that at lower temperatures Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx (400 °C), liquid oil yield was low and there was a relatively high yield of char. The optimum conditions for maximum liquid oil yield of 81% were achieved at 450 °C temperature and 75 min reaction time. The produced liquid oil at these optimum conditions has a dynamic viscosity of 1.77 mPa s, kinematic viscosity of 1.92 cSt, a density of 0.92 g/cm3, a pour point of 60 °C, a freezing point of 64 °C, a flash point of 30.2 °C and a HHV of 41.6 MJ/kg. The characteristics are similar to conventional diesel fuel. The GC–MS analysis showed that liquid oil contains mainly styrene (48%), toluene (26%) and ethyl-benzene (21%) compounds, however due to its composition this liquid needs further processing if it is to be used as a transport fuel. Acknowledgements Dr. Abdul-Sattar Nizami and Dr. Mohammad Rehan are funded from Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia under the Grant No. 1/ S/1433. Prof J.D. Murphy is funded from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant No. 12/RC/2302, with industrial co-funding from ERVIA, Gas Networks Ireland (GNI) through the Gas Innovation Group. References Achilias, D.S., 2007. A review of modeling of diffusion controlled polymerization reactions. Macromol. Theory Simul. 16, 319–347. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/mats.200700003. Adnan, S.J., Jan, M.R., 2014. Polystyrene degradation studies using Cu supported catalysts. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 109, 196–204. Aguado, R., Gaisán, B., Prieto, R., Bilbao, J., 2003. Kinetics of polystyrene pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 92, 91–99. Almeida, D., Marques, M.D.F., 2016. Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste. Polímeros 26, 44–51. APHA: American Public Health Association, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington D.C. Anjum, M., Miandad, R., Waqas, M., Ahmad, I., Alafif, Z.O.A., Aburiazaiza, A.S., Barakat, M.A., Akhtar, T., 2016. Solid waste management in Saudi Arabia: a review. J. Appl. Agric. Biotechnol. 1, 13–26. Artetxe, M., Lopez, G., Amutio, M., Barbarias, I., Arregi, A., Aguado, R., Bilbao, J., Olazar, M., 2015. Styrene recovery from polystyrene by flash pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Waste Manage. 45, 126–133. Ashworth, D.C., Elliott, P., Toledano, M.B., 2014. Waste incineration and adverse birth and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Environ. Int. 69, 120–132. Ates, F., Miskolczi, N., Borsodi, N., 2013. Comparison of real waste (MSW and MPW) pyrolysis in batch reactor over different catalysts. Part I: product yields, gas and pyrolysis oil properties. Bioresour. Technol. 133, 443–454. Bernando, M., 2011. Physico-chemical characterization of chars produced in the copyrolysis of wastes and possible routes of valorization. In: Chemical Engineering. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal, pp. 27–36. Bartoli, M., Rosi, L., Frediani, M., Undri, A., Frediani, P., 2015. Depolymerization of polystyrene at reduced pressure through a microwave assisted pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 113, 281–287. Bartoli, M., Rosi, L., Giovannelli, A., Frediani, P., Frediani, M., 2016. Bio-oil from residue of short rotation coppice of poplar using microwave assisted pyrolysis”. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 119, 224–232. Borsodi, N., Miskolczi, N., Angyal, A., Bartha, L., Kohán, J., Lengyel, A., 2011. Hydrocarbons obtained by pyrolysis of contaminated waste plastics. In: 45th International Petroleum Conference, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Chen, D., Yin, L., Wang, H., He, P., 2014. Pyrolysis technologies for municipal solid waste: a review. Waste Manage. 34, 2466–2486. Demirbas, A., 2004. Pyrolysis of municipal plastic wastes for recovery of gasoline range hydrocarbons. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 72, 97–102. Demirbas, A., Rehan, M., Al-Sasi, B.O., Nizami, A.S., 2016a. Evaluation of natural gas hydrates as a future methane source. Pet. Sci. Technol. 34, 1204–1210. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2016.1185442. Demirbas, A., Al-Sasi, B.O., Nizami, A.S., 2016b. Conversion of waste tires to liquid products via sodium carbonate catalytic pyrolysis. Energy Sour., Part A: Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 38 (16), 2487–2493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 15567036.2015.1052598. DeZuane, J., 1997. Handbook of Drinking Water Quality. John Wiley & Sons. Eqani, S.A.M.A.S., Khalid, R., Bostan, N., Saqib, Z., Mohmand, J., Rehan, M., Ali, N., Katsoyiannis, I.A., Shen, H., 2016. Human lead (Pb) exposure via dust from different land use settings of Pakistan: A case study from two urban mountainous cities. Chemosphere 155, 259–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2016.04.036. Farnoosh, A., Lantz, F., Percebois, J., 2014. Electricity generation analyses in an oilexporting country: transition to non-fossil fuel based power units in Saudi Arabia. Energy 69, 299–308. 9 Frediani, P., Rosi, L., Frediani, M., Undri, A., Occhialini, S., 2012. Cooperativa Autotrasportatori Fiorentini CAF-Societa’cooperativaarl. Production of hydrocarbons from copyrolysis of plastic and tyre material with microwave heating. U.S. Patent Application 14/007,236. Frediani, P., Undri, A., Rosi, L., Frediani, M., 2014. Waste/Contaminated Polystyrene Recycling through Reverse Polymerization. Lynwood ed., Nova Publisher. ISBN: 978-1-63321-371-5. Gardy, J., Hassanpour, A., Lai, X., Rehan, M., 2014. The influence of blending process on the quality of rapeseed oil-used cooking oil biodiesels. Int. Sci. J. (J. Environ. Sci.) 3, 233–240. Hansen, A.C., Zhang, Q., Lyne, P.W.L., 2005. Ethanol-diesel fuel blends – a review. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 277–285. Hernández, M.R., Gómez, A., García, A.N., Agulló, J., Marcilla, A., 2007. Effect of the temperature in the nature and extension of the primary and secondary reactions in the thermal and HZSM-5 catalytic pyrolysis of HDPE. Appl. Catal. A 317, 183–194. Isioma, N., Muhammad, Y., Sylvester, O’D., Innocent, D., Linus, O., 2013. Cold flow properties and kinematic viscosity of biodiesel. Univ. J. Chem. 1, 135–141. Jindaporn, J., Lertsatitthanakorn, C., 2014. Characterization and utilization of char derived from fast pyrolysis of plastic wastes. Proceedia Eng. 69, 1437–1442. Jung, S.H., Kim, S.J., Kim, J.S., 2013. The influence of reaction parameters on characteristics of pyrolysis oils from waste high impact polystyrene and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene using a fluidized bed reactor. Fuel Process. Technol. 116, 123–129. KACARE: King Abdullah City of Atomic and Renewable Energy, 2012. Renewable energy-waste to energy. A pillar of the sustainable energy kingdom. Presentation in: First International Environment Conference, 20–21 November2012, King Fahd Civic Centre, Yanbu Al Sinaiyah, KSA. <http:// www.energy.gov.sa/_pdf/KACARE%20Royal%20Decree%20english.pdf>. Kamal, D.M., Zainuri, F., 2015. Green product of liquid fuel from plastic waste by pyrolysis at 900 °C. J. Energy Power Eng. 9, 40–44. Kaustav, M.C.T., 2014. Performance and emission test of several blends of waste plastic oil with diesel and ethanol on four stroke twin cylinder diesel engine. In: IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. (IOSR-JMCE) 11 (2 ver. I), 47–51. E-ISSN: 2278-1648, pISSN:2320-334X. Khan, M.S., Kaneesamkandi, Z., 2013. Biodegradable waste to biogas: renewable energy option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud. 4, 101– 113. Kim, S.S., Agblevor, F.A., Lim, J., 2009. Fast pyrolysis of chicken litter and turkey litter in a fluidized bed reactor. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 15, 247–252. Kumar, S., Singh, R.K., 2011. Recovery of hydrocarbon liquid from waste high density polyethylene by thermal pyrolysis. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 28, 659–667. Lee, K.H., 2007. Pyrolysis of municipal plastic wastes separated by difference of specific gravity. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 79, 1–15. Lee, S., Yoshida, K., Yoshikawa, K., 2015. Application of waste plastic pyrolysis oil in a direct injection diesel engine: for a small scale non-grid electrification. Energy Environ. Res. 5 (1). 1927-0569. Lerici, L.C., Renzini, M.S., Pierella, L.B., 2015. Chemical catalyzed recycling of polymers: catalytic conversion of PE, PP and PS into fuels and chemicals over HY. Procedia Mater. Sci. 8, 297–303. Li, A.M., Li, X.D., Li, S.Q., Ren, Y., Chi, Y., Yan, J.H., Cen, K.F., 1999. Pyrolysis of solid waste in a rotary kiln: influence of final pyrolysis temperature on the pyrolysis products. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 50, 149–162. Lopez, A., Marco, D.I., Caballero, B.M., Laresgoiti, M.F., Adrados, A., 2011. Influence of time and temperature on pyrolysis of plastic wastes in a semi-batch reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 173, 62–67. de Marco, I., Caballero, B.M., López, A., Laresgoiti, M.F., Torres, A., Chomón, M.J., 2009. Pyrolysis of the rejects of a waste packaging separation and classification plant. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 85 (1–2), 384–391. Miandad, R., Barakat, M.A., Aburiazaiza, A.S., Rehan, M., Nizami, A.S., 2016a. Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste: a review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 102, 822–838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.022. Miandad, R., Barakat, M., Rehan, M., Ismail, I.M.I., Nizami, A.S., 2016b. The energy and value-added products from pyrolysis of waste plastics. In Book, ‘Recycling of Solid Waste for Biofuels and Bio-chemicals’ under Series Title: Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0150-5_12. Miandad, R., Rehan, M., Ouda, O.K.M., Khan, M.Z., Ismail, I.M.I., Shahzad, K., Nizami, A.S., 2016c. Waste-to-hydrogen energy in Saudi Arabia: challenges and perspectives. In Book, ‘biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective’. Springer, India. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ 978-81-322-3577-4_11. Miandad, R., Barakat, M.A., Aburiazaiza, A.S., Rehan, M., Ismail, I.M.I., Nizami, A.S., 2016d. Effect of plastic waste types on pyrolysis liquid oil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.017. Miskolczi, N., Angyal, A., Bartha, L., Valkai, I., 2009. Fuel by pyrolysis of waste plastics from agricultural and packaging sectors in a pilot scale reactor. Fuel Process. Technol. 90, 1032–1040. Mo, Y., Zhao, L., Wang, Z., Chen, C.L., Tan, G.Y.A., Wang, J.Y., 2014. Enhanced styrene recovery from waste polystyrene pyrolysis using response surface methodology coupled with Box-Behnken design. Waste Manage. 34, 763–769. Mohan, D., Pittman, C.U., Steele, P.H., 2006. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels 20, 848–889. Nikodinovic-Runic, J., Casey, E., Duane, G.F., Mitic, D., Hume, A.R., Kenny, S.T., O’Connor, K.E., 2011. Process analysis of the conversion of styrene to biomass Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 10 R. Miandad et al. / Waste Management xxx (2016) xxx–xxx and medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate in a two-phase bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 2447–2455. Nizami, A.S., Ouda, O.K.M., Rehan, M., El-Maghraby, A.M.O., Gardy, J., Hassanpour, A., 2015a. The potential of Saudi Arabian natural zeolites in energy recovery technologies. Energy 108, 162–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. energy.2015.07.030. Nizami, A.S., Rehan, M., Ouda, O.K., Shahzad, K., Sadef, Y., Iqbal, T., Ismail, I.M., 2015b. An argument for developing waste-to-energy technologies in Saudi Arabia. Chem. Eng. Trans. 45, 337–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1545057. Nizami, A.S., Rehan, M., Ismail, I.M.I., Almeelbi, T., Ouda, O.K.M., 2015c. Waste biorefinery in Makkah: a solution to convert waste produced during Hajj and Umrah Seasons into wealth. In: Conference: 15th Scientific Symposium for Hajj, Umrah and Madinah Visit. Held in May 2015 in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. http:// dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4303.6560. Nizami, A.S., Shahzad, K., Rehan, M., Ouda, O.K.M., Khan, M.Z., Ismail, I.M.I., Almeelbi, T., Basahi, J.M., Demirbas, A., 2016. Developing waste biorefinery in Makkah: a way forward to convert urban waste into renewable energy. Appl. Energy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.116. Oasmaa, M.A., Czernik, S., 1999. Fuel oil quality of biomass pyrolysis oils state of the art for the end users. Energy Fuels 13, 914–921. Onwudili, J.A., Insura, N., Williams, P.T., 2009. Composition of products from the pyrolysis of polyethylene and polystyrene in a closed batch reactor: effects of temperature and residence time. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 86, 293–303. Ouda, O.K.M., Raza, S.A., Nizami, A.S., Rehan, M., Al-Waked, R., Korres, N.E., 2016. Waste to energy potential: a case study of Saudi Arabia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 61, 328–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.005. Panda, A.K., Singh, R.K., 2013. Experimental optimization of process for the thermocatalytic degradation of waste polypropylene to liquid fuel. Adv. Energy Eng. (AEE) 1 (3). Rahmanian, N., Ali, S.H.B., Homayoonfard, M., Ali, N.J., Rehan, M., Sadef, Y., Nizami, A.S., 2015. Analysis of physiochemical parameters to evaluate the drinking water quality in the State of Perak, Malaysia. J. Chem., 1–10 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1155/2015/716125 716125. Rathore, D., Nizami, A.S., Pant, D., Singh, A., 2016. Key issues in estimating energy and greenhouse gas savings of biofuels: challenges and perspectives. Biofuel Res. J. 10, 380–393. Rehan, M., Nizami, A.S., Taylan, O., Al-Sasi, B.O., Demirbas, A., 2016a. Determination of wax content in crude oil. Pet. Sci. Technol. 34 (9), 799–804. Rehan, M., Nizami, A.S., Shahzad, K., Ouda, O.K.M., Ismail, I.M.I., Almeelbi, T., Iqbal, T., Demirbas, A., 2016b. Pyrolytic liquid fuel: a source of renewable energy in Makkah. Energy Sour., Part A: Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects 38 (17), 2598–2603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2016.1153753. Ringer, M., Putsche, V., Scahill, J., 2006. Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. A technical report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), US. NREL/TP-510-37779. Available from: <http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/37779.pdf>. Robert, D.O., 2011. Improving the cold flow properties of biodiesel by fractionation, Soybean – Applications and Technology, Prof. Tzi-Bun Ng (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953307-207-4, InTech, Available from: <http://www. intechopen.com/books/soybean-applications-and technology/improving the cold-flow-properties-of biodiesel by-fractionation. Royal Decree establishing King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable, No. A 35, 17 April 2010. Available from: <http://www.energy.gov.sa/_pdf/KACARE% 20Royal%20Decree%20english.pdf>. Sadef, Y., Nizami, A.S., Batool, S.A., Chaudhary, M.N., Ouda, O.K.M., Asam, Z.Z., Habib, K., Rehan, M., Demibras, A., 2015. Waste-to-energy and recycling value for developing integrated solid waste management plan in Lahore. Energy Sour. Part B 11 (7), 569–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1556249.2015.105295. Saptoadi, H., Pratama, N.N., 2015. Utilization of plastics waste oil as partial substitute for kerosene in pressurized cookstoves. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 6, 5. Sarker, M., Rashid, M.M., Rahman, M.S., Molla, M., 2012. Aromatic light hydrocarbon fuel generation from municipal polystyrene (PS) waste plastic by using low temperature fractional distillation process. Int. J. 2 (8), 1–10. SEC, 2012. Saudi Electric Company (annual report). <http://www.se.com.sa/SEC/ English>. Sharma, B.K., Moser, B.R., Vermillion, K.E., Doll, K.M., Rajagopalan, N., 2014. Production, characterization and fuel properties of alternative diesel fuel from pyrolysis of waste plastic grocery bags. Fuel Process. Technol. 122, 79–90. Siddiqui, M.N., Redhwi, H.H., 2009. Pyrolysis of mixed plastic for recovery of useful products. Fuel Process. 90, 545–552. Sinha, V., Mayank, R., Patel, J., Patel, V., 2010. Pet waste management by chemical recycling: a review. J. Polym. Environ. 18 (1), 8–25. Sriningsih, W., Saerodji, M.G., Trisunaryanti, W., Armunanto, R., Falah, I.I., 2014. Fuel production from LDPE plastic waste over natural zeolite supported Ni, Ni-Mo, Co and Co-Mo metals. Procedia Environ. Sci. 20, 215–224. Syamsiro, M., Saptoadi, H., Norsujianto, T., Noviasri, P., Cheng, S., Alimuddin, Z., Yoshikawa, K., 2014. Fuel oil production from municipal plastic wastes in sequential pyrolysis and catalytic reforming reactors. Energy Procedia 47, 180– 188. Tröger, N., Richter, D., Stahl, R., 2013. Effect of feedstock composition on product yields and energy recovery rates of fast pyrolysis products from different straw types. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 100, 158–165. Undri, A., Rosi, L., Frediani, M., Frediani, P., 2011. Microwave Pyrolysis of Polymeric Materials. INTECH Open Access Publisher. Undri, A., Meini, S., Rosi, L., Frediani, M., Frediani, P., 2013. Microwave pyrolysis of polymeric materials: waste tires treatment and characterization of the valueadded products. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 103, 149–158. Undri, A., Frediani, M., Rosi, L., Frediani, P., 2014a. Reverse polymerization of waste polystyrene through microwave assisted pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 105, 35– 42. Undri, A., Rosi, L., Frediani, M., Frediani, P., 2014b. Upgraded fuel from microwave assisted pyrolysis of waste tire. Fuel 115, 600–608. Undri, A., Abou-Zaid, M., Briens, C., Berruti, F., Rosi, L., Bartoli, M., Frediani, M., Frediani, P., 2015. A simple procedure for chromatographic analysis of bio-oils from pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 114, 208–221. US-EIA: US Energy Information Administration, 2014. Country Analysis Brief: Saudi Arabia. Available from: <http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=sa>. Williams, P.T., Williams, E.A., 1999. Interaction of plastics in mixed plastics pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 13, 188–196. Wongkhorsub, C., Chindaprasert, N., 2013. A comparison of the use of pyrolysis oils in diesel engine. Energy Power Eng. 5, 350–355. Please cite this article in press as: Miandad, R., et al. Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023 View publication stats