Uploaded by adri

mazzini

advertisement
1851
LONDON. MAZZINI’S EUROPEAN
DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
And not only is England a safe place of refuge for every
foreigner who, in his native land, has fallen a victim
to civil discords, but she is, in fact, the last sanctuary,
in Europe, open to the human mind itself.
Louis Blanc, 1848. Historical Revelations218
With France’s international role as defender of civil and political liberties in free-fall, it was London’s turn to rise as a beacon of freedom
for the world and a meeting point for exiled and persecuted political dissenters. The French authorities were becoming concerned that
arrests, surveillance and intimidation at home drove French and foreign agitators away from France to London, which quickly acquired a
reputation as an international centre for the activities of conspiratorial groups aiming to launch a pan-European revolution. A report of
the Parisian prefect of police of August 1851 listed an Association of
exiled French socialist democrats, a Socialist democratic committee
of German refugees, a Hungarian democratic society, a section of the
Polish Democratic Committee and an Italian national committee, all
operating on British soil.219
In the summer of 1850, Giuseppe Mazzini, exiled in London, had
formed the Central European Democratic Committee, an underground association bringing together some of the leading republicans, revolutionaries and radicals expelled from their countries by the
defeat of the 1848 movements, people such as the former Montagnard
Alexandre Ledru-Rollin, the Pole Albert Darász and the German professor of philosophy Arnold Ruge. Romanian moderates such as Ion
Ghica and Nicolae Bălcescu were reluctant to join the Committee and
risk appearing, in Ghica’s words, as the “anarchists and enemies of
social order” feared by the Turkish and the European governments.220
218
Louis Blanc, 1848. Historical Revelations, inscribed to Lord Normanby (London,
1858), Preface, v–vi.
219
I. Tchernoff, Associations et sociétés secrètes sous la deuxième république, 1848–
1851 (Paris, 1905), 343, 373–6.
220
Din arhiva lui D. Brătianu, 1: 44–5.
190
1851
Dumitru Brătianu, who had no such qualms, applied to join, in the
firm belief that common action would be a step towards greater cohesion among the European and Central-European left and especially
among the exiled revolutionaries. In April 1851 he arrived in London
with a letter to Mazzini from Edgar Quinet and another to LedruRollin from Michelet. “Mr. Bratiano aîné” was, Michelet wrote in his
letter, “one of the founders of Wallachian liberty and his country’s
foremost thinker.”221 The formal Wallachian offer of underground revolutionary collaboration was accepted by the Committee in mid-June
and the Committee’s “Manifesto to the Romanians” welcomed their
adoption into the great family of the peoples in preparation for the
great battle between “the spirit of good and the spirit of evil” in the
world.222 The Romanians responded on 11 September with a “Manifesto to the European Committee”. “Forgotten, unknown by the peoples of the West (Occident), by our own blood brethren of the Latin
family, misunderstood by the peoples of the East (Orient), harassed by
our neighbours, alone we have walked erect throught the times and
the numberless tempests that Asia kept hurling towards us.”223 The
Romanians declared themselves ready to join “the holy crusade for
democracy” and aim towards building a “Danubian confederation of
equal nations”.224
Mazzini also negotiated an agreement between Hungarians and
Romanians prior to Brătianu’s admission to the Committee: a pledge
towards a peaceful solution to ethnic differences in Transylvania,
guaranteed universal suffrage for all the ethnic minorities, as well
as a truce pending victory and the start of a European Democratic
Congress were among Mazzini’s conditions for admitting Hungarians
and Romanians into the republican brotherhood.225 In his visionary
enthusiasm, Mazzini obviously glossed over ethnic, geopolitical and
diplomatic nuances and conundrums, an approach which partly justified Golescu-Albu’s criticism of the Italian leader.226 Nevertheless, the
Romanians were pleased enough with their new international affiliation to send their “Manifesto” for publication to six major French
221
Ibid., 45.
Ibid., 46.
223
Smochină, “Sur les émigrés roumains à Paris”, 187–8. The entire text is reproduced by Smochină on pp. 187–93.
224
Ibid., 190.
225
Ibid.
226
See p. 197 below.
222
Download