В настоящее время крупнейшие месторождения нефти и газа в

,
,
.
,
,
,
«
»
.
.
,
60-65 %
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
,
[1-3].
,
,
.
)
(
)
,
.
.
(
3
,
)
).
.
.
.
,
,
)
.
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
(
)
4
.
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
»
.
.
,
,
.
[4-6]
.
[7-9].
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
:
5
1)
)
;
2)
;
3)
;
4)
;
5)
(
)
,
,
;
6)
,
;
7)
;
8)
,
–
;
9)
,
.
.
,
.
–
[10],
(
,
,
,
).
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
6
.
,
,
–
.
,
,
,
:
,
(
)
;
(
)
.
,
.
15
3
25,4
,
.
,
[11].
229
.
,
,
,
.
,
7
12
,
,
3
14,5
,
,
.
[12-16].
,
,
,
).
,
.
,
.
,
(
)
,
.
,
.
,
,
.
(
).
.
20-23
3
– 9,0-14,5
.
8
,
3
,
.
,
.
–
,
.
.
[11].
,
,
.
,
,
–
.
,
,
:
1)
,
2)
3
8-12
,
– 8-12
;
,
,
3
, ,
.
,
,
,
.
20
9
.
,
.
.
.
,
: 1)
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
; 2)
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
10
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
(
).
,
,
.
«
»,
,
,
,
.
,
,
11
.
,
.
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
(
)
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
2300-2350
3
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
12
,
1.Bennion D.B., Thomac F.B., Bietz R.F and Bennion D.W.
Underbalanced Drilling, Praises and Perila, SPEDC (December 1998),
pp.214-222, SPE 52889/
2.Stone R. The History and Deverlopment of Underbalanced Drilling in
the USA, paper presented at the 1995 International Underbalanced Drilling
Conference & Exhibition, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2-4 October/
3.Santos H. and Queiraz I. Hove Effective is Underbalanced Drilling in
Preventing Formation Damage, Paper SPE 58738, 2000 International Conference
on Formation Damage, Lafayette, 23-24 February 2000.
4.
.,
.
.
//
, 2011,
5.
.,
2.
.22-25.
.,
.
//
.19-22.
6.
.,
//
, 2011,
.
, 2012,
7.
4.
1.
.11-13.
.
//
.
:
«Printmash», 2004. . 104-109.
8.Ivan C., Quintana I. and Blake L. Aphron – Base Drilling Fluid:
Evolving Technologies for Lost Circulation Control, Paper SPE 71377, presented
at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New
Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September – 30 October 2001.
9.Ivan C., Growcock F. and Friedheim I. Chemical and Physical
Characterization of Aphron – Bazed Drilling Fluids, Paper SPE 77445, presented
13
at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio,
Texas, 29 September – 2 October 2002.
10.Reid P., Labenski F. and Santos H. Drilling Fluids approaches for
Control of Wellbore Instability in Fractured Formations, Paper SPE/IADC 85304,
presented at the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and
Exhibition held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 20-22 October 2003
11.Semmelbeck M.E. and Dewan I.T. Invasion-Based Method For
Estimating Permeability From loga, Paper SPE 30581, presented at the SPE
Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Dallas, TX, USA, 22-25
October 1995.
12.Bennion D.B., Thomas F.B. and Bennion D.W. Effective laboratory
coreflood tests to evaluate and minimize formation damage in horizontal wells:
Third International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, November 1214, 1991, Houston, Texas.
13.Abrams A. Mud design to minimize rock impairment due to particle
invasion: Journal of Petroleum Technology, may 1977, 586-592.
14.Glenn E.E. and Slusser M.L. Factors affecting well productivety II –
drilling fluid particle invasion into porous media: Trans Soc. Pet. Eng. 1954, Vol
210, 126-131.
15.Krueger R.F, an overview of formation damage and well productivity
in oilfield operations: Journal of Petroleum Technology, February 1986, 131-152.
16.Potter K.E. an overview of formation damage: Journal of Petroleum
Technology, Ang. 1989, 780-786/
17.Santos H. Differentially Stuck Pipe: Early Diagnostic and solution,
Paper SPE 59127, presented at the 2000 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held
New Orleans, Louisiana, 22-25 February 2000.
14