Îðèãèíàëüíûå ñòàòüè Ôîðìèðîâàíèå àðòåðèîâåíîçíûõ ôèñòóë ìåòîäîì òðàíñïîçèöèè âåí âåðõíåé êîíå÷íîñòè А.Ю.Беляев Городсаялиничесаябольница№52,.Мосва The creation of arterio-venous fistulas by transposition of the upper arm veins A.Y.Beliaev Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ïðîãðàììíûé ãåìîäèàëèç, ïîñòîÿííûé ñîñóäèñòûé äîñòóï, àðòåðèîâåíîçíàÿ ôèñòóëà. Ïàöèåíòû, ïîëó÷àþùèå ïîñòîÿííûé ãåìîäèàëèç, íóæäàþòñÿ â äîëãîñðî÷íîì íàäåæíîì ñîñóäèñòîì äîñòóïå. Àðòåðèîâåíîçíàÿ ôèñòóëà, ñôîðìèðîâàííàÿ èç òðàíñïîíèðîâàííîé àóòîëîãè÷íîé âåíû è áðàõèàëüíîé àðòåðèè, îáåñïå÷èâàåò ïîñòîÿííûé ñîñóäèñòûé äîñòóï (ÏÑÄ) ïðè îòñóòñòâèè òðåáóåìîé ïîâåðõíîñòíîé âåíû, îíà îáåñïå÷èâàåò äîëãîñðî÷íûé ÏÑÄ è äîëæíà ðàññìàòðèâàòüñÿ êàê ìåòîä âûáîðà ïåðåä óñòàíîâêîé ñîñóäèñòîãî ïðîòåçà. Patients who require long-term hemodialysis need long-term vascular access. The transposed autologous vein to brachial artery arteriovenous fistula provides vascular access in the absence of adequate superficial vein. Transposed basilic (brachial) vein to brachial artery fistula have a good long-term patency rate and should be considered early, before prosthetic grafting, in the absence of a suitable superficial veins. Ââåäåíèå Ñîçäàíèå àäåêâàòíîãî ïî îáúåìó êðîâîòîêà è áåçîïàñíîãî â ýêñïëóàòàöèè ïîñòîÿííîãî ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà (ÏÑÄ) ó áîëüíûõ ñ òåðìèíàëüíîé õðîíè÷åñêîé ïî÷å÷íîé íåäîñòàòî÷íîñòüþ ÿâëÿåòñÿ ïðèîðèòåòíîé çàäà÷åé ñ öåëüþ îáåñïå÷åíèÿ ýôôåêòèâíîãî è äîëãîâðåìåííîãî ïðîâåäåíèÿ ïðîãðàììíîãî ãåìîäèàëèçà.  íàèáîëüøåé ñòåïåíè òðåáîâàíèÿì, ïðåäúÿâëÿåìûì ê îïòèìàëüíîìó ñîñóäèñòîìó äîñòóïó, óäîâëåòâîðÿåò íàòèâíàÿ àðòåðèîâåíîçíàÿ ôèñòóëà (ÀÂÔ), áåçîãîâîðî÷íî ïðèçíàþùàÿñÿ ìåòîäîì âûáîðà ïðè ôîðìèðîâàíèè ÏÑÄ, ÷òî îáóñëîâëåíî íèçêîé ÷àñòîòîé îñëîæíåíèé è ñòàáèëüíîé ôóíêöèåé â òå÷åíèå ìíîãèõ ëåò ýêñïëóàòàöèè [1, 21, 25]. Ïîýòîìó ñòðàòåãè÷åñêèì íàïðàâëåíèåì ðåøåíèÿ ïðîáëåìû ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà äëÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà ÿâëÿåòñÿ ìàêñèìàëüíî âîçìîæíîå óâåëè÷åíèå äîëè ÀÂÔ â îáùåé ñòðóêòóðå ÏÑÄ [32, 34]. Ê ñîæàëåíèþ, âî ìíîãèõ ñëó÷àÿõ ôîðìèðîâàíèå ñòàíäàðòíîé äèñòàëüíîé èëè ïðîêñèìàëüíîé ÀÂÔ íåâîçìîæíî ïî ïðè÷èíå ìíîãî÷èñëåííûõ ïðåäøåñòâóþùèõ ñîñóäèñòûõ îïåðàöèé, èíäèâèäóàëüíûõ îñîáåííîñòåé àðõèòåêòîíèêè ñîñóäîâ èëè èõ ïàòîëîãè÷åñêèõ èçìåíåíèé.  ýòîé ñèòóàöèè âûáîð ñïîñîáà îáåñïå÷åíèÿ ÏÑÄ îáû÷íî îñóùåñòâëÿåòñÿ ìåæäó èì- ïëàíòàöèåé ñèíòåòè÷åñêîãî ñîñóäèñòîãî ïðîòåçà (ÑÑÏ) èëè òîííåëüíîãî öåíòðàëüíîãî âíóòðèâåííîãî êàòåòåðà (ÖÂÊ), ôîðìèðîâàíèåì ðåòðîãðàäíîé ÀÂÔ, òðàíñïîçèöèåé îäíîé èç âåí êîíå÷íîñòè. Èìïëàíòàöèÿ ÑÑÏ íå èìååò ñóùåñòâåííûõ ïðåèìóùåñòâ ïåðåä íàòèâíîé ÀÂÔ, à ïî ðÿäó ïîêàçàòåëåé çíà÷èòåëüíî óñòóïàåò åé.  ïîñëåäíèå ãîäû îòìå÷åíà âûðàæåííàÿ òåíäåíöèÿ ê îãðàíè÷åíèþ ïîêàçàíèé äëÿ ïðèìåíåíèÿ ÑÑÏ â êà÷åñòâå ïåðâè÷íîãî ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà [24, 27]. Ýòî îáúÿñíÿåòñÿ ñòàòèñòè÷åñêè äîñòîâåðíî ìåíüøåé äëèòåëüíîñòüþ ôóíêöèîíèðîâàíèÿ ÑÑÏ è áîëüøèì êîëè÷åñòâîì íåîáõîäèìûõ êîððèãèðóþùèõ ïðîöåäóð â ïîñëåîïåðàöèîííîì ïåðèîäå ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ ÀÂÔ [12, 22]. Êðîìå ýòîãî, ÑÑÏ ÿâëÿþòñÿ ñåðüåçíûì ôàêòîðîì ðèñêà â îòíîøåíèè âîçìîæíûõ èíôåêöèîííûõ îñëîæíåíèé [28, 31]. Íåñìîòðÿ íà òî ÷òî ïðè íàëè÷èè àäåêâàòíûõ ìàãèñòðàëüíûõ ñîñóäîâ êîíå÷íîñòè íå ñóùåñòâóåò òåõíè÷åñêèõ ïðîáëåì â èìïëàíòàöèè ÑÑÏ äëÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà, ôóíêöèîíàëüíî ïðèãîäíàÿ íàòèâíàÿ ÀÂÔ ïðåäïî÷òèòåëüíåå ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà, ñîçäàííîãî ñ ïðèìåíåíèåì ñèíòåòè÷åñêèõ ìàòåðèàëîâ [29, 30]. Êàê àëüòåðíàòèâó ÑÑÏ â îòäåëüíûõ ñîñóäèñòûõ öåíòðàõ ôîðìèðóþò òàê íàçûâàåìûå «ðåòðîãðàäíûå» ÀÂÔ [14, 19], çàðåêîìåíäîâàâøèå ñåáÿ, ñ îäíîé ñòîðîíû, âûñîêîé âûæèâàåìîñòüþ è âîçìîæíîñòüþ îòñðî÷êè ïðèìåíåíèÿ ÑÑÏ äëÿ ñîçäàíèÿ ÏÑÄ, ñ äðóãîé – íèç- Àäðåñ äëÿ ïåðåïèñêè: 123182, ã. Ìîñêâà, Ïåõîòíàÿ óë., ä. 3/2. ÃÊÁ ¹ 52 130 Íåôðîëîãèÿ è äèàëèç · Ò. 10, ¹ 2 2008 Ôîðìèðîâàíèå àðòåðèîâåíîçíûõ ôèñòóë ìåòîäîì òðàíñïîçèöèè âåí âåðõíåé êîíå÷íîñòè êèìè ôóíêöèîíàëüíûìè ïîêàçàòåëÿìè (íå áîëåå 65% ÀÂÔ òàêîãî òèïà ïðèãîäíû ê ýêñïëóàòàöèè) è áîëüøîé ÷àñòîòîé ðàçâèòèÿ îñëîæíåíèé [2]. Íåñìîòðÿ íà õîðîøèå ïîêàçàòåëè äëèòåëüíîñòè ôóíêöèîíèðîâàíèÿ è îòíîñèòåëüíóþ ïðîñòîòó õèðóðãè÷åñêîãî âûïîëíåíèÿ ðåòðîãðàäíûõ ÀÂÔ, áîëüøèíñòâî ñïåöèàëèçèðîâàííûõ ñîñóäèñòûõ öåíòðîâ íå ïðèìåíÿþò ýòîò âàðèàíò ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà ïî ïðè÷èíå áûñòðîãî ðàçâèòèÿ îñëîæíåíèé è èõ çíà÷èòåëüíîé âûðàæåííîñòè (îòåê êîíå÷íîñòè, òðîôè÷åñêèå íàðóøåíèÿ â ìÿãêèõ òêàíÿõ âïëîòü äî èçúÿçâëåíèÿ, äëèòåëüíûå ïîñòèíúåêöèîííûå êðîâîòå÷åíèÿ èç àíåâðèçìàòè÷åñêè èçìåíåííûõ ó÷àñòêîâ) (ðèñ. 1). Âñå ýòî íå ïîçâîëÿåò â ïîëíîé ìåðå ñ÷èòàòü òàêîé âèä ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà äîëãîâðåìåííûì. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ÀÂÔ íà áåäðå ïóòåì òðàíñïîçèöèè áîëüøîé ïîäêîæíîé âåíû íîãè ïîëó÷èëî íåîäíîçíà÷íûå îöåíêè èññëåäîâàòåëåé. Îäíè ñ÷èòàþò åãî ïðèîðèòåòíûì ïî îòíîøåíèþ ê èìïëàíòàöèè ñîñóäèñòûõ ïðîòåçîâ íà íèæíåé êîíå÷íîñòè [16]. Äðóãèå ïîëàãàþò, ÷òî îáëàñòü ïðèìåíåíèÿ ìåòîäà ñóùåñòâåííî îãðàíè÷åíà ïî ïðè÷èíå âûñîêîé ÷àñòîòû ðàçâèòèÿ ñîïóòñòâóþùèõ îñëîæíåíèé (äåãåíåðàöèÿ âåíîçíîé ñòåíêè âñëåäñòâèå íàðóøåíèÿ åå êðîâîñíàáæåíèÿ, àíåâðèçìû è ïñåâäîàíåâðèçìû, äëèòåëüíûå êðîâîòå÷åíèÿ èç ïóíêöèîííûõ îòâåðñòèé, èíôèöèðîâàíèå, ñèíäðîì «îáêðàäûâàíèÿ»), íåèçáåæíî âîçíèêàþùèõ ïðè ýêñïëóàòàöèè ýòîãî âèäà ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà è òðåáóþùèõ äîïîëíèòåëüíûõ ðåêîíñòðóêòèâíûõ âìåøàòåëüñòâ [15, 18]. Ïðèìåíåíèå òîííåëüíûõ ÖÂÊ, ïîëó÷èâøåå ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèå â ïîñëåäíèå ãîäû, ÿâëÿåòñÿ îïðàâäàííûì, à âî ìíîãèõ ñëó÷àÿõ è åäèíñòâåííî ïðèåìëåìûì äëÿ ïðîâåäåíèÿ ïðîãðàììíîãî ãåìîäèàëèçà ïðè íåâîçìîæíîñòè èëè íåöåëåñîîáðàçíîñòè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ÏÑÄ ó îïðåäåëåííîé êàòåãîðèè ïàöèåíòîâ (ïîñëå èñ÷åðïàíèÿ ðåñóðñà íàòèâíûõ ñîñóäîâ äëÿ ñîçäàíèÿ ÏÑÄ è â ñâÿçè ñ íåâîçìîæíîñòüþ ïðîâåäåíèÿ ïåðèòîíåàëüíîãî äèàëèçà; ó ìàëîëåòíèõ äåòåé; ó ïàöèåíòîâ ñ âûðàæåííûì ïîðàæåíèåì ñîñóäîâ; ó áîëüíûõ ñ äèëàòàöèîííîé êàðäèîìèîïàòèåé èëè îíêîëîãè÷åñêèìè çàáîëåâàíèÿìè â òåðìèíàëüíîé ñòàäèè) [3, 8, 11, 20, 33]. Îäíàêî òîëüêî îêîëî 30–40% òîííåëüíûõ ÖÂÊ îñòàþòñÿ ôóíêöèîíàëüíî ïðèãîäíûìè ÷åðåç 1 ãîä, äàæå ñ ó÷åòîì âûïîëíåíèÿ êîððèãèðóþùèõ âìåøàòåëüñòâ [1], êðîìå ýòîãî, ÷àñòîòà ðàçâèòèÿ èíôåêöèîííûõ îñëîæíåíèé è ñìåðòíîñòü ñóùåñòâåííî ïðåâûøàþò òàêîâóþ ïðè ôîðìèðîâàíèè ÀÂÔ èëè èìïëàíòàöèè ÑÑÏ [5, 6, 37]. Âñå ýòî íå ïîçâîëÿåò â ïîëíîé ìåðå îòíåñòè äàííûé âèä ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà ê êàòåãîðèè ïîñòîÿííîãî. Òðàíñïîçèöèÿ v. basilica (v. brachialis) íà ïëå÷å, â ñèëó òîïîãðàôî-àíàòîìè÷åñêèõ îñîáåííîñòåé ýòèõ âåí (îòíîñèòåëüíî áîëüøàÿ ãëóáèíà ðàñïîëîæåíèÿ, îáùèé ôàñöèàëüíûé ôóòëÿð ñ ïëå÷åâîé àðòåðèåé), âûïîëíÿåòñÿ â öåëÿõ îáåñïå÷åíèÿ óäîáñòâà è áåçîïàñíîñòè èõ ïóíêöèé äëÿ âûïîëíåíèÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà (ðèñ. 2). Ýôôåêòèâíîñòü ìåòîäà äîñòàòî÷íî âûñîêà, áîëüøèíñòâî èññëåäîâàòåëåé íà îñíîâàíèè äàííûõ î ñóùåñòâåííî ëó÷øåé ñîõðàííîñòè ôóíêöèè è ìåíüøåé ÷àñòîòå îñëîæíåíèé ñ÷èòàþò åãî ïðÿìîé àëüòåðíàòèâîé èìïëàíòàöèè ÑÑÏ [17, 23, 26, 36]. Ïî äàííûì çà- Îðèãèíàëüíûå ñòàòüè Ðèñ. 1. Òðîôè÷åñêèå íàðóøåíèÿ, ðàçâèâøèåñÿ ÷åðåç 6 ìåñÿöåâ ïîñëå ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ «ðåòðîãðàäíîé» ÀÂÔ Ðèñ. 2. Ñõåìà îïåðàöèè ïî òðàíñïîçèöèè ïëå÷åâîé âåíû ðóáåæíûõ èññëåäîâàòåëåé, ïîêàçàòåëè 1-ãîäè÷íîé âûæèâàåìîñòè ÀÂÔ ñ òðàíñïîçèöèåé âåí ïëå÷à íàõîäÿòñÿ â ïðåäåëàõ 74–100% [13, 38]. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ÀÂÔ ìåòîäîì òðàíñïîçèöèè âåí ïëå÷à ìîæåò îñóùåñòâëÿòüñÿ êàê â îäèí ýòàï (òðàíñïîçèöèÿ âûïîëíÿåòñÿ îäíîâðåìåííî ñ ñîçäàíèåì àðòåðèîâåíîçíîãî àíàñòîìîçà), òàê è äâóõýòàïíî (ïîñëå «ñîçðåâàíèÿ» âåíû) [9, 13, 39]. Ñîñóäèñòîå ñîóñòüå ôîðìèðóåòñÿ ìåæäó a. brachialis è v. basilica (èëè v. brachialis) â ëîêòåâîé ÿìêå èëè äèñòàëüíîé òðåòè ïëå÷à [7, 10]. Ïðåèìóùåñòâà äâóõýòàïíîãî ìåòîäà òðàíñïîçèöèè çàêëþ÷àþòñÿ â òîì, ÷òî ìîáèëèçàöèè ïîäâåðãàåòñÿ óæå «ñîçðåâøàÿ» ôèñòóëüíàÿ âåíà ñ óòîëùåííîé (ãèïåðïëàçèðîâàííîé) ñîñóäèñòîé ñòåíêîé, âñëåäñòâèå ýòîãî áîëåå óñòîé÷èâàÿ ê òðàâìàòèçàöèè [4]. Êðîìå ýòîãî, II ýòàï ìîæåò âîîáùå íå ïîòðåáîâàòüñÿ, òàê êàê îêîëî òðåòè ÀÂÔ ïî òèïó «êîíåö â áîê – v. basilica – a. brachialis» ìîãóò áûòü ôóíêöèîíàëüíî ïðèãîäíûìè äëÿ ïðîâåäåíèÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà áåç âûïîëíåíèÿ òðàíñïîçèöèè âåíû. Ïðîòÿæåííîñòü ïåðåìåùåííîãî ó÷àñòêà âåíû ïëå÷à äîëæíà áûòü äîñòàòî÷íîé äëÿ îñóùåñòâëåíèÿ ýôôåêòèâíîãî ãåìîäèàëèçà, íî íå ìàêñèìàëüíî âîçìîæíîé, òàê êàê ñ óâåëè÷åíèåì äëèíû ìîáèëèçîâàííîãî ñåãìåíòà ðàñòåò âåðîÿòíîñòü ðàçâèòèÿ òðîìáîçà, à òàêæå äåãåíåðàòèâíûõ èçìåíåíèé ñîñóäèñòîé ñòåíêè [35]. Îïåðàöèè ïî òðàíñïîçèöèè ãëóáîêî ðàñïîëîæåííûõ âåí ïëå÷à â Ðîññèè ïîêà íå ïîëó÷èëè ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèÿ. Íàø ïåðâîíà÷àëüíûé îïûò ïðèìåíåíèÿ ìåòîäà ñâèäåòåëüñòâóåò î âîçìîæíîñòè åãî ãàðàíòèðîâàííîãî òåõíè÷åñêîãî âûïîëíåíèÿ è ýôôåêòèâíîñòè â ïëàíå îáåñïå÷åíèÿ àäåêâàòíîãî ïðîãðàììíîãî ãåìîäèàëèçà. Ò. 10, ¹ 2 2008 · Íåôðîëîãèÿ è äèàëèç 131 Îðèãèíàëüíûå ñòàòüè À.Þ. Áåëÿåâ Ðèñ. 3. Ðàñïîëîæåíèå ôèñòóëüíîé (ïëå÷åâîé) âåíû äî åå òðàíñïîçèöèè Ðèñ. 4. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ïîäêîæíîãî ëîæà äëÿ ôèñòóëüíîé (ïëå÷åâîé) âåíû Ìàòåðèàëû è ìåòîäû Âñåãî âûïîëíåíî 17 îïåðàöèé ïî òðàíñïîçèöèè ãëóáîêèõ âåí ïëå÷à ñ öåëüþ îáåñïå÷åíèÿ ÏÑÄ. Âñå îïåðàöèè âûïîëíÿëèñü äâóõýòàïíûì ìåòîäîì. Ïàöèåíòàìè â 14 ñëó÷àÿõ áûëè æåíùèíû, â 3 – ìóæ÷èíû (ñðåäíèé âîçðàñò 54,5 ± 4,3 ãîäà). Ñîñóäèñòûé àíàñòîìîç â 14 îïåðàöèÿõ ôîðìèðîâàëñÿ â ëîêòåâîé ÿìêå, â 3 – â äèñòàëüíîé òðåòè ïëå÷à (â 10 ñëó÷àÿõ – ìåæäó a. brachialis è v. basilica, â 4 – ìåæäó a. è v. brachialis). ×åðåç 3–7 íåäåëü ïîñëå ñîçäàíèÿ ñîñóäèñòîãî àíàñòîìîçà âûïîëíÿëñÿ II ýòàï – ìîáèëèçàöèÿ è òðàíñïîçèöèÿ ôèñòóëüíîé âåíû (ðèñ. 3–5). Ðåçóëüòàòû Âî âñåõ íàáëþäåíèÿõ äîñòèãíóòà 100% òåõíè÷åñêàÿ ýôôåêòèâíîñòü, ò. å. äî ìîìåíòà íà÷àëà ýêñïëóàòàöèè â êà÷åñòâå ÏÑÄ äëÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà (â ñðåäíåì 62,7 ± 13,4 äíÿ ïîñëå îïåðàöèè I ýòàïà) íè îäíà ÀÂÔ íå óòðàòèëà ñâîåé ôóíêöèè. Ïðè ýòîì ïîñëå âûïîëíåíèÿ II ýòàïà âî âñåõ ñëó÷àÿõ äîñòèãíóòû ïîñòàâëåííûå öåëè: ïîâåðõíîñòíîå (è ñîîòâåòñòâåííî äîñòóïíîå äëÿ ïóíêöèé) ðàñïîëîæåíèå ôèñòóëüíîé âåíû, àäåêâàòíûé êðîâîòîê ïî íåé, áåçîïàñíîñòü ïóíêöèé ÀÂÔ (ðèñê òðàâìèðîâàíèÿ ïëå÷åâîé àðòåðèè ìèíèìàëåí). Ê ìîìåíòó íàïèñàíèÿ ñòàòüè ïîëó÷åíû äàííûå îá èñïîëüçîâàíèè äëÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà 11 ÀÂÔ ïîñëå òðàíñïîçèöèè ãëóáîêèõ âåí ïëå÷à (èç íèõ ó îäíîé ÀÂÔ ôóíêöèÿ áåçâîçâðàòíî óòðà÷åíà ïî ïðè÷èíå òðîìáîçà). Ïðè ôîðìèðîâàíèè ÀÂÔ ñ òðàíñïîçèöèåé ãëóáîêî ðàñïîëîæåííûõ âåí âåðõíèõ êîíå÷íîñòåé ìîæåò áûòü äîñòèãíóòî îïòèìàëüíîå ñîîòíîøåíèå ýôôåêòèâíîñòè è áåçîïàñíîñòè ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ ðåòðîãðàäíîé ÀÂÔ, èìïëàíòàöèåé ÑÑÏ èëè òîííåëüíîãî ÖÂÊ. Íè â îäíîì ñëó÷àå ïîñëå òðàíñïîçèöèè ÀÂÔ íå áûëî îòìå÷åíî îñëîæíåíèé, ñâÿçàííûõ ñ èíôèöèðîâàíèåì ñîñóäèñòîãî äîñòóïà èëè ïîñëåîïåðàöèîííîé ðàíû ëèáî ñ íàðóøåíèåì êðîâîñíàáæåíèÿ êîíå÷íîñòè. Òðàíñïîçèöèÿ ÀÂÔ, ñ îäíîé ñòîðîíû, ïðîëîíãèðóåò âîçìîæíîñòü ýêñïëóàòàöèè ïîòåíöèàëà íàòèâíûõ ñîñóäîâ è îòäàëÿåò íåîáõîäèìîñòü èìïëàíòàöèè ÑÑÏ, ñ 132 Íåôðîëîãèÿ è äèàëèç · Ò. 10, ¹ 2 2008 Ðèñ. 5. Ðàñïîëîæåíèå ôèñòóëüíîé (ïëå÷åâîé) âåíû ïîñëå åå òðàíñïîçèöèè äðóãîé – îáåñïå÷èâàåò ëó÷øèå òåõíè÷åñêèå è ãåìîäèíàìè÷åñêèå óñëîâèÿ äëÿ ïîñëåäíåé â ñëó÷àå åå íåèçáåæíîñòè (àíàñòîìîç ÑÑÏ ìîæåò áûòü âûïîëíåí ñ óæå «ñîçðåâøåé» äèëàòèðîâàííîé âåíîé). Äîïîëíèòåëüíûì ïðåèìóùåñòâîì ìåòîäà ÿâëÿåòñÿ òî, ÷òî ñîõðàíÿåòñÿ ðåàëüíûé âàðèàíò (åñëè ïîòðåáóåòñÿ) ïîñëåäóþùåé èìïëàíòàöèè ÑÑÏ íà ãëóáîêèå ñîñóäû âåðõíåé êîíå÷íîñòè. Êðîìå ýòîãî, âîçìîæíî óñïåøíîå ñîçäàíèå ÀÂÔ ñ èñïîëüçîâàíèåì äëÿ ïîñëåäóþùåé òðàíñïîçèöèè âåíû îòíîñèòåëüíî íåáîëüøîãî äèàìåòðà (äî 3 ìì â äèàìåòðå), ò. å. íåàäåêâàòíîé ïî ðàçìåðó äëÿ èìïëàíòàöèè ÑÑÏ. Òàêòèêà ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ÀÂÔ ñ ïîñëåäóþùåé åå òðàíñïîçèöèåé ó ïàöèåíòîâ ñ èñ÷åðïàííûì ðåñóðñîì íàòèâíûõ ïîâåðõíîñòíûõ âåí ïîçâîëèëà óìåíüøèòü äîëþ èìïëàíòàöèé ÑÑÏ â ñòðóêòóðå îïåðàöèé ïî îáåñïå÷åíèþ ÏÑÄ ñ 22,2% (2001–2006 ãã.) äî 2,2% (2007 ã.). Îñíîâíûì íåäîñòàòêîì ñïîñîáà äâóõýòàïíîãî ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ÀÂÔ ñ òðàíñïîçèöèåé âåí ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ äðóãèìè ìåòîäàìè ñîçäàíèÿ ÏÑÄ ÿâëÿþòñÿ áîëüøèå ñðîêè îò ìîìåíòà ñîçäàíèÿ ñîñóäèñòîãî àíàñòîìîçà äî íà÷àëà ýêñïëóàòàöèè ÀÂÔ äëÿ ãåìîäèàëè- Ôîðìèðîâàíèå àðòåðèîâåíîçíûõ ôèñòóë ìåòîäîì òðàíñïîçèöèè âåí âåðõíåé êîíå÷íîñòè Ðèñ. 6. Èñïîëüçîâàíèå äëÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà ïëå÷åâîé âåíû ïîñëå åå òðàíñïîçèöèè çà, ÷òî òðåáóåò äîëãîâðåìåííîãî ïðèìåíåíèÿ ÖÂÊ è óâåëè÷èâàåò ðèñê ðàçâèòèÿ ñîîòâåòñòâóþùèõ îñëîæíåíèé. Äðóãîé íåäîñòàòîê ÀÂÔ ïîñëå òðàíñïîçèöèè ôèñòóëüíîé âåíû ñâÿçàí ñ âîçìîæíûìè òåõíè÷åñêèìè ïðîáëåìàìè ïðè åå ïóíêöèÿõ íà íà÷àëüíîì ýòàïå èñïîëüçîâàíèÿ äëÿ ãåìîäèàëèçà. Ýòî îáúÿñíÿåòñÿ îïðåäåëåííîé òðóäíîñòüþ òî÷íîé ïàëüïàòîðíîé èäåíòèôèêàöèè ïðîåêöèè è ãëóáèíû ðàñïîëîæåíèÿ ôèñòóëüíîé âåíû ïî ïðè÷èíå âûðàæåííûõ ðóáöîâûõ èçìåíåíèé ìÿãêèõ òêàíåé âîêðóã íåå. Ïîýòîìó êàðòèðîâàíèå ôèñòóëüíîé âåíû ìåòîäîì ÓÇÈ ïðåäñòàâëÿåòñÿ îïðàâäàííûì ðóòèííûì ìåòîäîì ïåðåä íà÷àëîì åå ïóíêöèé.  íåêîòîðûõ ñëó÷àÿõ ïðîåêöèÿ ôèñòóëüíîé âåíû ìîæåò ñîâïàäàòü ñ ëèíèåé ïîñëåîïåðàöèîííîãî ðóáöà, ÷òî òàêæå óñëîæíÿåò åå ðóòèííóþ ýêñïëóàòàöèþ (ðèñ. 6). Ïî ðåçóëüòàòàì íàøèõ îïåðàöèé àíàëèç äîëãîâðåìåííîé âûæèâàåìîñòè ÀÂÔ ñ òðàíñïîçèöèåé ãëóáîêèõ âåí ïðåäïëå÷üÿ íå ïðèâîäèòñÿ â äàííîé ðàáîòå èççà îòíîñèòåëüíî íåáîëüøîãî ñòàòèñòè÷åñêîãî ìàòåðèàëà è äëèòåëüíîñòè íàáëþäåíèé. Íî ïðåäâàðèòåëüíûå äàííûå îäíîçíà÷íî ñâèäåòåëüñòâóþò â ïîëüçó ýòîãî ìåòîäà ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ èìïëàíòàöèåé ÑÑÏ. Âûâîäû Ñîçäàíèå ÀÂÔ ñ òðàíñïîçèöèåé ãëóáîêî ðàñïîëîæåííûõ âåí âåðõíèõ êîíå÷íîñòåé îòêðûâàåò ðåàëüíûå ïåðñïåêòèâû äëÿ ìàêñèìàëüíîãî èñïîëüçîâàíèÿ ïîòåíöèàëà íàòèâíûõ ñîñóäîâ äëÿ ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ÏÑÄ. Ïîëó÷åííûå ðåçóëüòàòû ïðèìåíåíèÿ ìåòîäà âñåëÿþò îïðåäåëåííûé îïòèìèçì â ïëàíå äîïîëíèòåëüíîé âîçìîæíîñòè âûïîëíåíèÿ òåõíè÷åñêè îòíîñèòåëüíî íåñëîæíîé îïåðàöèè, êîòîðàÿ ìîæåò èìåòü àáñîëþòíûé êëèíè÷åñêèé óñïåõ ïðè ìèíèìóìå îñëîæíåíèé è ýêîíîìè÷åñêèõ çàòðàò. Ëèòåðàòóðà 1. Ðóêîâîäñòâî ïî äèàëèçó. Ïîä ðåä. Äæîíà Ò. Äàóãèðäàñà, Ïèòåðà Äæ. Áëåéêà, Òîääà Ñ. Èíãà. Ïåð. ñ àíãë. ïîä ðåä. À.Þ. Äåíèñîâà è Â.Þ. Øèëî. Òðåòüå èçäàíèå. Ì.: Öåíòð äèàëèçà – Òâåðü: Òðèàäà, 2003: 744. 2. Ôèëèïöåâ Ï.ß., Ìîéñþê ß.Ã., Èâàíîâ È.À., Ñîêîëüñêèé À.Ñ. Òàêòèêà àíãèîõèðóðãè÷åñêîãî îáåñïå÷åíèÿ áîëüíûõ íà ïðîãðàììíîì ãåìîäèàëèçå (ìåòîäè÷åñêèå ðåêîìåíäàöèè). Ì.: ÌÎÍÈÊÈ èì. Ì.Ô. Âëàäèìèðñêîãî, 1987: 3–14.3. 3. Akoh J.A. Central venous catheters for haemodialysis: a review. Niger Postgrad Med J 2001; 8 (2): 99–103. Îðèãèíàëüíûå ñòàòüè 4. Angle N., Chandra A. The two-stage brachial artery-brachial vein autogenous fistula for hemodialysis: an alternative autogenous option for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (4): 806–810. 5. Ash S.R. Chronic central venous catheters for dialysis and the Ash Split Cath® catheter: rationale and clinical experience. Contrib Nephrol 2004; 142: 128–252. 6. Asif A., Merrill D., Leon C. et al. Strategies to minimize tunneled hemodialysis catheter use. Blood Purif 2006; 24 (1): 90–94. 7. Bazan H.A., Schanzer H. Transposition of the brachial vein: a new source for autologous arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (1): 184–186. 8. Conz P.A., Catalano C., Rizzioli E., Normanno M., Fabbian F., Preciso G. Ash Split Cath in geriatric dialyzed patients. Int J Artif Organs 2001 Sep; 24 (9): 663–665. 9. Dahduli S.A., Qattan N.M., Al-Kuhaymi R.A., Al-Jabreen M.A., AlKhader A.A. Mobilization and superficialization of basilic vein for brachio basilic fistula. Saudi Med J 2002; 23 (10): 1203–1205. 10. Dorobantu L.F., Stiru O., Iliescu V.A., Novelli E. The brachio-brachial arteriovenous fistula: a new method in patients without a superficial venous system in the upper limb. J Vasc Access 2006; 7 (2): 87–89. 11. Ferrari G., Talassi E., Baraldi C., Lambertini D., Tarchini R. [Vascular access validity and treatment efficiency in hemodialysis]. [Article in Italian]. G Ital Nefrol 2003; 20 (Suppl. 22): S22–S29. 12. Fitzgerald J.T., Schanzer A., McVicar J.P. et al. Upper arm arteriovenous fistula versus forearm looped arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis access: a comparative analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19 (6): 843–850. 13. Francis D.M., Lu Y., Robertson A.J. et al. Two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula for chronic haemodialysis access. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77 (3): 150–155. 14. Geis W.P., Giacchino J.L., Iwatsuki S. et al. The reverse fistula for vascular access. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977; 145 (6): 901–904. 15. Gradman W.S., Laub J., Cohen W. Femoral vein transposition for arteriovenous hemodialysis access: improved patient selection and intraoperative measures reduce postoperative ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41 (2): 279–284. 16. Hazinedaroglu S.M., Tuzuner A., Ayli D. et al. Femoral vein transposition versus femoral loop grafts for hemodialysis: a prospective evaluation. Transplant Proc 2004; 36 (1): 65–67. 17. Hossny A. Brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula: different surgical techniques and their effects on fistula patency and dialysis-related complications. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37 (4): 821–826. 18. Illig K.A., Orloff M., Lyden S.P., Green R.M. Transposed saphenous vein arteriovenous fistula revisited: new technology for an old idea. Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 10 (3): 212–215. 19. Jennings W.C. Creating arteriovenous fistulas in 132 consecutive patients: exploiting the proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula: reliable, safe, and simple forearm and upper arm hemodialysis access. Arch Surg 2006; 141 (1): 27–32. 20. Lopez-Menchero R., del Pozo C., Andreo L. et al. [Vascular access outcome in patients aged over 75 years]. [Article in Spanish]. Nefrologia 2006; 26 (6): 711–718. 21. Malovrh M. Strategy for the maximal use of native arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. Scientific World Journal 2006; 14 (6): 808–815. 22. Maya I.D., Allon M. Outcomes of thrombosed arteriovenous grafts: comparison of stents vs angioplasty. Kidney Int 2006; 69 (5): 934–937. 23. Mazzoni G., Frattarelli D., Iafrancesco D. et al. [Arteriovenous brachio-basilic fistula as hemodialysis port. Original technique and long term results]. [Article in Italian]. G Chir 2003; 24 (10): 371– 376. 24. NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. New York: National Kidney Foundation, 1997; 191. 25. Ohira S., Kon T., Imura T. Evaluation of primary failure in native AV-fistulae (early fistula failure). Hemodial Int 2006; 10 (2): 173– 179. 26. Oliver M.J., McCann R.L., Indridason O.S., Butterly D.W., Schwab S.J. Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. Kidney Int 2001; 60 (4): 1532– 1539. 27. Ravani P., Spergel L.M., Asif A. et al. Clinical epidemiology of arteriovenous fistula in 2007. J Nephrol 2007; 20 (2): 141–149. 28. Ryan S.V., Calligaro K.D., Scharff J., Dougherty M.J. Management of infected prosthetic dialysis arteriovenous grafts. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (1): 73–78. Ò. 10, ¹ 2 2008 · Íåôðîëîãèÿ è äèàëèç 133 Îðèãèíàëüíûå ñòàòüè 29. Sands J.J. Increasing AV fistulae and decreasing dialysis catheters: two aspects of improving patient outcomes. Blood Purif 2007; 25 (1): 99–102. 30. Santoro A., Canova C., Freyrie A., Mancini E. Vascular access for hemodialysis. J Nephrol 2006; 19 (3): 259–264. 31. Schutte W.P., Helmer S.D., Salazar L., Smith J.L. Surgical treatment of infected prosthetic dialysis arteriovenous grafts: total versus partial graft excision. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (3): 385–388. 32. Spergel L.M. Fistula first initiative: how we got here & where we are going? J Vasc Access 2006; 7 (4): 154–156. 33. Tesio F., Panarello G. Long-term vascular access; the Tesio catheter. Contrib Nephrol 2004; 142: 153–158. 34. Vazques M. Patients with inadequate veins or prior vein abuse (patient’s failure). J Vasc Access 2006; 7 (4): 163–164. 35. Weyde W., Krajewska M., Letachowicz W. et al. A new technique for autogenous brachiobasilic upper arm transposition for À.Þ. Áåëÿåâ vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Access 2006; 7 (2): 74–76. 36. Woo K., Farber A., Doros G. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of the transposed upper arm arteriovenous fistula: a single institutional review of 190 basilic and cephalic vein transposition procedures. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (1): 94–99. 37. Xue J.L., Dahl D., Ebben J.P., Collins A.J. The association of initial hemodialysis access type with mortality outcomes in elderly medicare ESRD patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42 (5): 1013–1019. 38. Yilmaz M., Senkaya I., Saba D., Bicer M. Long-term outcomes of basilic vein transposition fistula for hemodialysis. Vasa 2007; 36 (1): 29–32. 39. Zielinski C.M., Mittal S.K., Anderson P., Cummings J., Fenton S., Reiland-Smith J., Frock J.T., Dunlay R.W. Delayed superficialization of brachiobasilic fistula: technique and initial experience. Arch Surg 2001; 136 (8): 929–932. Ñóáúåêòèâíûå ïîêàçàòåëè ôèçè÷åñêîãî çäîðîâüÿ, ñâÿçàííûå ñ âûæèâàåìîñòüþ áîëüíûõ íà ãåìîäèàëèçå И.А.Васильева1,В.А.Добронравов1,Е.В.Бабарыина2 1 НИИнефролоииСант-Петерб$рсооос$дарственноомедицинсоо $ниверситетаим.аад.И.П.Павлова,.Сант-Петерб$р; 2 Oбластнаялиничесаябольница,.Омс Subjective measures of physical health associated with survival in hemodialysis patients I.A.Vasilieva,V.A.Dobronravov,E.V.Babarykina Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: êà÷åñòâî æèçíè, âûæèâàåìîñòü, ãåìîäèàëèç. Ïðîâåäåí ðåòðîñïåêòèâíûé àíàëèç âûæèâàåìîñòè 125 áîëüíûõ, ïîëó÷àâøèõ ëå÷åíèå ãåìîäèàëèçîì (ÃÄ). Èñõîäíîé âðåìåííîé òî÷êîé ñ÷èòàëîñü ïðîâåäåíèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ êà÷åñòâà æèçíè ïî ìåòîäèêå SF-36 â ñî÷åòàíèè ñ ðåãèñòðàöèåé êëèíèêî-äåìîãðàôè÷åñêèõ ïàðàìåòðîâ. Îöåíèâàëàñü ïðîãíîñòè÷åñêàÿ çíà÷èìîñòü ýòèõ ïîêàçàòåëåé â îòíîøåíèè âûæèâàåìîñòè. Ãðóïïà óìåðøèõ áîëüíûõ (n = 46) èñõîäíî îòëè÷àëàñü äîñòîâåðíî áîëåå íèçêèì óðîâíåì ïîêàçàòåëåé êà÷åñòâà æèçíè. Óñòàíîâëåíî, ÷òî ïîêàçàòåëü ôèçè÷åñêîãî ôóíêöèîíèðîâàíèÿ è ñóììàðíûé èíäåêñ ôèçè÷åñêîãî çäîðîâüÿ, áàçèðóþùèåñÿ íà ñàìîîöåíêå áîëüíîãî, ÿâëÿþòñÿ âàæíûìè íåçàâèñèìûìè ïðåäèêòîðàìè âûæèâàåìîñòè ÃÄ-ïàöèåíòîâ íàðÿäó ñî ñðåäíèì îáúåìîì óëüòðàôèëüòðàöèè, êàëüöèé-ôîñôàòíûì ïðîèçâåäåíèåì, ñðåäíèì óðîâíåì àëüáóìèíà. Ïîêàçàòåëè ïñèõè÷åñêîãî çäîðîâüÿ îáñëåäîâàííîé ãðóïïû áîëüíûõ ñ âûæèâàåìîñòüþ ñâÿçàíû íå áûëè. A retrospective analysis of survival of 125 haemodialysis patients was carried out. Evaluation of quality of life (using the SF-36 scoring method) and assessment of clinical and demographic variables have been performed the initial time point of the study. The aim of the work was to assess the predictive value of quality of life scores and clinical data. Quality of life scoring correlated significantly with survival rate. In the group of patients who died during the period of observation (n = 46) the baseline quality of life scores were significantly lower than in the group of survivals. Patient’s self-assessed physical functioning and physical summary score were found to be significant independent predictors of survival as well as the mean ultrafiltration volume, serum albumin level and Ñà-Ð product. No significant correlation was found between the mental health scores and survival rate. Àäðåñ äëÿ ïåðåïèñêè: 197022, ã. Ñàíêò-Ïåòåðáóðã, óë. Ë. Òîëñòîãî, ä. 17. ÑÏáÃÌÓ èì. àêàä. È.Ï. Ïàâëîâà, ÍÈÈ íåôðîëîãèè. Âàñèëüåâîé È.À. Òåëåôîí: (812) 234-01-65 Å-mail: [email protected] 134 Íåôðîëîãèÿ è äèàëèç · Ò. 10, ¹ 2 2008