Сравнительная геномика Полиморфизм генома человека Василий Евгеньевич Раменский, Институт молекулярной биологии РАН ФББ, 4 курс People are different… …and so are their genomes …caccagctcctgtgGggggaggccctgct… …caccagctcctgtgGggggaggccctgct… …caccagctcctgtgGggggaggccctgct… …caccagctcctgtgCggggaggccctgct… …caccagctcctgtgCggggaggccctgct… Определение SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism): существование в популяции на одной и той же позиции геномной ДНК двух нуклеотидных вариантов с частотой более редкого варианта (аллеля) ≥1% 5’---------------A---------------3’ ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 3’---------------T---------------5’ Na 5’---------------G---------------3’ ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 3’---------------C---------------5’ Ng Na+Ng = N, Na/N ≥0.01, Ng/N ≥0.01 Комментарии к определению •речь идет о сравнении последовательностей одного биол. вида •слово «полиморфизм» не имеет в русском языке множественного числа (Н.Ляпунова, личное сообщение) •в обыденной речи под «полиморфизмом» чаще всего подразумевают именно нуклеотид (т.е. используют его как синоним слова «мутация») •определение подразумевает достоверное измерение частот в популяции(-ях), что в текущей практике пока редкость Типы полиморфизма в геноме * однонуклеотидный (SNP) * короткая вставка/делеция * микросателлитный повтор различной длины (VNTR, variable number tandem repeat) * вставка объекта * множественный нуклеотидный (MNP) Некоторые свойства SNPs • Comprise the ~90% of human genetic variation • Occur with an average density ~1/1000 bp • Transition C↔T(G↔A) occurs at ~2/3 of all cases, three transversions C↔A (G↔T), C↔G(G↔C), T↔A(A↔T) in ~1/6 of all cases each • Most of them (~85%) are common to all populations (with differing allele frequencies) Why SNPs are important? • Convenient genetic markers • Responsible for existence of various phenotypes, with primary interest in disease ones • Pharmacogenomics: individual response to drugs • Clues to understand human evolution SNP в геноме человека dbSNP build statistics Build 10? 106 110 119 124 Date # rs’s, x106 Feb. 01. . . . . . . . . .1.42 Aug. 02. . . . . . . . . .2.81 Jan. 03. . . . . . . . . . 3.05 Jan. 04. . . . . . . . . . 7.23 Jan. 05 . . . . . . . . . .10.0 Estimates of SNP density in the human genome • Li and Sadler (1991), Genetics, ~1/1000 bp • Zhao et al., (2003), Gene: ~1/1200 bp • dbSNP, build 124 (2005): ~1/300 bp (?) Классификация SNP по положению в геноме 1. гены 1.1 UTR 1.2 экзоны (cSNP) 1.2.1 синонимичные(sSNP) 1.2.2 несинонимичные (nsSNP) 1.3 интроны 1.4 сайты сплайсинга 2. регуляторные участки генов (rSNP) 3. межгенные участки Synonymous vs. non-synonymous SNPs: Example: Lysosomal alpha-glucosidase precursor (SwissProt P10253) Hypothetical SNP: C T HGVBase ID: SNP000003023 G C …CAC CAG CTC CTG TGG GGG GAG GCC CTG CT… …CAC CAG CTC CTG TGC GGG GAG GCT CTG CT… … H Q L L W G E A L … … H Q L L C G E A L … nsSNP Trp746Cys sSNP Ala749Ala Summary of Annotation on human Genome Build 33 dbSNP Build 124 : FUNCTION CLASS CODE 1 GENE COUNT SNP COUNT 338787 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 26210 Locus region 39214 Allele synonymous to contig 14342 nucleotide 4 50772 Allele nonsynonymous to contig 15710 nucleotide 5 546965 6 2925773 7 832 8 89554 9 7111 3 17898 untranslated region 19332 intron 769 splice site 18655 Allele is same as contig nucleotide 1006 Coding: synonymy unknown Упражнение В одной базе ~11,000 nsSNPs в ~6,000 белков. В другой базе ~47,000 последовательностей белков общей длиной ~19.5x106 остатков. Оценить (а) среднюю длину белка (б) среднее число nsSNP в одном белке (в) среднее число nsSNP на единицу длины белка Жизненный цикл SNP (по Miller&Kwok, 2001) I. Появление нового аллельного варианта путем мутации (~100 мутаций на индивидуум) II. «Выживание» до момента появления гомозигот по этому аллелю III. Медленное увеличение частоты в популяции IV. Фиксация нового аллеля (0 vs. 100%), превращение в between-species difference Упражнение Описанный выше жизненный цикл SNP занимает ~0.3 млн лет. Предполагая, что разделение человека и шимпанзе произошло ~5 млн лет назад, а выход H.sapiens из Африки и разделение различных популяций ~0.1-0.2 млн лет назад, аргументировать возможность существования (а) одинаковых SNPs у человека и других видов, (б) «private» SNP, т.е. локализованных в пределах одной человеческой популяции Why polymorphisms are maintained in the population? • Selectionists: because heterozygotes have higher fitness • Neutralists: because all observed polymoprhisms are selectively neutral - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Reality: is always somewhat more complicated Why SNPs are important? • Convenient genetic markers • Responsible for existence of various phenotypes, with primary interest in disease ones • Pharmacogenomics: individual response to drugs • Clues to understand human evolution nsSNPs vs. disease mutations Disease mutations are rare (<<1%) and usually cause monogenic diseases (e.g., cystic fibrosis) nsSNPs are frequent (>1%) and can modify risks of major common (multigenic, complex) diseases (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular disease, mental illness, autoimmune states, diabetes) In some cases, however, it is difficult to make a distinction Some common nsSNPs are known to affect critical structure features Frequency of the haemochromatosis allelic variant of HLA-H protein Cys260Tyr (with destroyed disulphide bond) is up to 6% in Northern Europe Identifying SNPs responsible for specific phenotypes whole genome scan – hypothesis free approach; extraordinary number of candidate SNPs candidate gene studies – requires a priori models; nevertheless, large numbers of candidate SNPs to be tested Both methods, however, require huge amounts of expensive experimental data and are are statistically unreliable. Therefore, in silico expertise is required Methods for prediction of effect of nsSNPs * Sequence-based methods: analysis of multiple alignment with homologs Ng-Henikoff [2002] * Structure-based methods: analysis of various structural parameters Wang, Moult [2001]; Chasman, Adams [2001] * Combined methods: sequence and structure analysis Sunyaev,Ramensky,Bork [2000, 2001, 2002] PolyPhen: prediction of amino acid substitution effect on protein function Data sources: 1. Sequence annotation of the query protein 2. PSIC profile matrix values derived from multiple alignment with homologous proteins 3. Structural parameters and contacts of query protein structure or its >50% homolog Prediction: benign (neutral), damaging (deleterious) PolyPhen query processing flowchart sequence annotation INPUT: •Sequence: …IMAGLQQTNSE… •Position: 133 •Var1: Q •Var2: P PSIC profile scores for two amino acid variants •ACC/ID (if known protein): DMD_HUMAN structural parameters and contacts prediction rules PREDICTION: •damaging •benign •unknown I. Sequence annotation Hereditary hemochromatosis protein precursor (HLA-H, Q30201) Features checked: * bond: DISULFID, THIOLEST, THIOETH * site: BINDING, ACT_SITE, LIPID, METAL, SITE, MOD_RES, SE_CYS * region: TRANSMEM, SIGNAL, PROPEP II. PSIC: profile analysis of homologous sequences 1. Align with homologous proteins with seq. ide. 30..94% II. PSIC: profile analysis of homologous sequences 2. Calculate the profile matrix with PSIC algorithm Profile matrix: Sa,j = ln[ pa,j / qa ], a = {1,..20}, j = {1,..N}, N = alignment length SAsn,4 SCys,4 II. PSIC: profile analysis of homologous sequences 3. Analyse difference between profile scores for two a.a. variants: AsnCys: = | SAsn,4 – SCys,4 | = 1.591 SAsn,4 SCys,4 III. 3D structure analysis 1. Residues that are in spatial contact with a ligand or other “critical” residues Zen 999 residues in 5Å contact with Zen 999 Bos Taurus trypsin [PDB ID :1ql7] III. 3D structure analysis 2. Residues that form the hydrophobic core of the protein (buried residues) Surface residues Buried residues Bos Taurus trypsin [PDB ID :1ql7] Structural parameters and contacts Secondary structure Phi-psi dihedral angles Solvent accessible surface area, normed s.a.s.a Change in accessible surface propensity Change in residue side chain volume Contacts with heteroatoms Interchain contacts Contacts with functional sites (BINDING, ACT_SITE, LIPID, and METAL) Region of the phi-psi map (Ramachandran map) Normalised B-factor (temperature factor) RULES (connected with logical AND) PREDICTION PSIC score difference : Substitution site properties: arbitrary annotated as a functional* or bond formation** site arbitrary in a region annotated or predicted as transmembrane PHAT matrix difference resulting from substitution is negative 0.5 arbitrary arbitrary benign >1.0 atoms are closer than 3.0Å to atoms of a ligand or residue annotated as BINDING, ACT_SITE, LIPID, METAL arbitrary probably damaging not considered normed accessibility ACC15% 0.5<1.5 normed accessibility ACC5% 1.5<2.0 >2.0 Substitution type properties: absolute change of accessible surface propensity is 0.75 or absolute change of side chain volume is 60 absolute change of accessible surface propensity is 1.0 or absolute change of side chain volume is 80 probably damaging possibly damaging possibly damaging probably damaging arbitrary arbitrary possibly damaging arbitrary arbitrary probably damaging Control sets all dam unknown dam/(dam+ben) ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Disease mutations Strict set 444 366 3 82.9% Total 2,782 2,047 70 75.4% Between species substitutions Total 671 58 5 8.7% PolyPhen: predictions for nsSNPs All SNPs from HGVBase, rel.12.............................983,589 synonymous...................................9,310 (5,378 proteins) non-synonymous..............................11,152 (6,124 proteins) Predictions for nsSNPs: unknown................................................1,987 benign.................................................6,317 possibly damaging......................................1,591 probably damaging......................................1,257 Prediction basis: multiple alignment...................................2,654 sequence annotation....................................118 structure...............................................76 PolyPhen predictions for dbSNP b.121 [ Ivan Adzhubei, 2004 ] All: 9,502 27,991 7,905 5,521 50,919 unknown benign...............67.6% possibly damaging....19.1% probably damaging....13.3% total (44,005 unique rs’s) With structure: 42 2,142 531 1,076 3,791 unknown benign...............57.1% possibly damaging....14.2% probably damaging....28.7% total (,167 uniqe rs’s) PolyPhen predictions for dbSNP b.121 [ Ivan Adzhubei, 2004 ] All: Filtered: 5 seq. in multiple alignment 16,813 5,195 4,168 26,176 benign...............64.2% possibly damaging....19.8% probably damaging....15.9% total (21,677 unique rs’s) With structure: Filtered: 5 seq. in multiple alignment 2,021 499 1,050 3,570 benign...............56.6% possibly damaging....14.0% probably damaging....29.4% total (2,983 unique rs’s) Hydrophobic core stability parameters are the best predictors Ramensky et al., Nucleic Acids Res. (2002) 30:3894-90 PolyPhen http://www.bork.embl.de/PolyPhen PolyPhen input : Protein identifier OR sequence Substitution position Substitution type PolyPhen http://www.bork.embl.de/PolyPhen PolyPhen: nsSNPs data collection Transphyretin (PDB: 1tyr, SNP000012365) Thr118 Asn occurs at the ligand (REA) binding site Thr 118 REA 130 DAMAGING nsSNPs Trypsin (PDB: 1trn, SNP000012965) Ser142Phe results in the strong side chain volume change at a buried position DAMAGING nsSNPs Ser 142 PolyPhen: дитя семи нянек ЦИКЛОП ПОЛИФЕМ ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЛ СОБОЙ УНИКАЛЬНЫЙ ПОДВИД КАРЛИКОВЫХ СЛОНОВ Известия-Наука, 18 ноября 2003 Вонзая заостренное бревно в единственный глаз свирепого циклопа Полифема, легендарный Одиссей истреблял уникальный вид карликовых слонов, обитавших на острове Сицилия. Древний миф об одноглазых человекообразных исполинах развеяли итальянские палеонтологи на научной экспозиции "Полифем в Модене". На выставке представлены черепа, обнаруженные исследователями на Сицилии, у которых одна фронтальная глазница. С первого взгляда она очень напоминает глаз во лбу. Найденные рядом с черепами кости действительно принадлежат немаленькому млекопитающему, которое имело габариты крупного медведя. Обладатель этих останков был не циклопом, а карликовым слоном. "Глаз" во лбу - отверстие для дыхательных путей, то есть для хобота. Polyphenism: the ability of a single genome to produce two or more alternative morphologies within a single population in response to an environmental cue (such as temperature, photoperiod, or nutrition). [Dr. Ehab Abouheif, McGill University, Montréal Québec] The seasonal morphs of the buckeye butterfly, Precis coenia (Nymphalidae). The ventral surfaces are shown. The Summer morph ("linea") is on the left; the Fall morph ("rosa") is on the right. [Scott F.Gilbert, A Companion to Developmental Biology. Chapter 22, Seasonal Polyphenism in Butterfly Wings] Damaging nsSNPs • We estimate that ~20% of non-synonymous cSNPs from databases are damaging • Average allele frequency of non-synonymous cSNPs predicted to be damaging is twice lower than for benign non-synonymous cSNPs • We propose to use these predictions for prioritisation of candidates for association studies