ЛИЧНОСТНЫ Е ФУНКЦИИ В СТРУКТУРЕ ЯЗЫ КОВОЙ ЛИЧНОСТИ

1
(13)
"
",
,
,
-
,
.
,
,
:
,
.
,
#
#
,
. %
#
2005
,
&
,
$$
-
1.
,
.
!
,
(
). "
.
-
.
,
#
-
,
!
,
:
, 2002. – 477 .
2. %
.(
/ ) .
.
. – %., 2003.
3.
. . +
:
.
.
.–
, 1999. – 23
4.
. .,
. .
"
. –
.,
, 2001. – 192 .
.–
. .'
-
,
-
*.%. % -
.
: ,
. …
-
"
Ilyinova E. Y. Demythologization of concepts in literary tradition of folktale // Vestnik of Volgograd State Medical
University. – 2005. – - 1. – P. 88–91.
The article deals with the reflection of mythical concepts in the folktale discourse. The evaluative component of the
concept is viewed as a key element that may cause cognitive changes in the value and image constituents of the concept, which lead to the semantic restructuring of the concept in the text.
. /: 802/809:301
. .
-
0
,
,
1
,
#
,
.
,
#
,
,
#
.
#
,
. (
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.,
-
,
.
.
-
-
,
('4). "
,
,
–
-
–
&
&-
,
-
3
,
!
!
-
#
,
,
,
.
-
,
,
-
,
#
,
-
[2, . 280].
,
-
.
2
91
.
# -
1
(13)
2005
4
,
,
.
, ".,. 5
(,.+. ,
) [1, . 4],
&
,
# ,
,
,
.
#
"
.
,
:
!
!
,
,
,
3
,.
,
"'"
%
. ."
.
,
. . "
-
,
,
,
!
,
-
,
,
,,
,
,
. 4
– ! ,
,
-
,
#
. 6
-
#
,
.
"'",
-
3
#
, . .
!
-
.
#
".4. 3
!
.
-
.
".4.
-
. "
,
"
,
[9, . 26].
.
#
, . .
-
[8, . 102].
+
5.0. 4
."
2
,
-
./!
,
,
),
).
,
-
-
(
(
.) ,
. . "
,
"
,
#
(
–
#
,
,
-
,
"…
" [10, . 498].
#
,
),
,
, ,
. "+
" [6, . 746].
,
,
#-
#
),
,
-
(
(
-
. .
. 2
,
(
-
"
-
,
,
" [9, . 28].
:
),
),
.4
,–!
,
.
,
,
-
,
,
–
-
. ."
,
&
#
,
,
,
"
-
,
. 2
,
"
,
92
–
,
-
.
– !
[5, . 251].
-
-
1
(13)
,
%.%. 7
"'. 4
!
,
–
-
.
",
-
,
–
-
.
,
.4
"
.6
%.%. 7
,
.
"
,
,
,–
#
3
,
,
,
,
!
,
,
! $ " !,
, "
%
$'
! ,
(
!
.
)
!
(
.
"3
,
%"
$'
,
" [7, . 22]. 6
. . "
,
,
%
,
,
!
.
,
–
,
,
.
.
. . "
[9, . 29],
,
,
,
3
,
.
,
,
2. 3
,
.
,
"'", . .
4. 3
-
-
-
,
–
,
-
.
5. "
,
,
93
-
-
6
-
–
.
,
-
-
,
#
,
,
,
5
,!
,
3.
-
.
.
. "
-
:
,
,
-
!
[9, . 37],
:
,
,
. ." ,
-
5. . 1
. ."
1. 3
-
– !
& ,
;
-
– !
,
-
,
-
.
3
*
!
.(
-
-
!
%"
,
,
" [3, . 7].
4
-
,
".
,
&
,
-
,
-
-
#
.
#
,
,
&
,
,
. 6
,
.2
-
,
.
-
)
#
-
.
(
&
2005
-
4
-
. "2
&
&
,
,
-
,
"
)
: "…
("
,
.
,
,
,
,
-
1
(13)
2005
,
,
,
#
1.
-
!
,
.
,
#
#
#
.
,
"
3.
-
,
-
[2, . 317].
.
-
"
#
(
-
–
-
.
):
-+
. .,. 4
. . "
(
.–"
$
…
,
-
.
.
, 2002. – ". 317.
. . 4
(
):
.
….
.
.
.–
, 1996. – 37 .
4.
.+. 8
:
:
.
.–7
, 1997.
5. ,
&
.-. ,
: 2- . – %., 1983. – 6. 1. – ". 251.
6. (
. . "
/
.
.
.
,
. 0.9. 8
. – 16.,
. – %.: 3 . ., 1984. – 797 .
7.
. . 4
.
3
, 1996. – 320 .
8. . $ /
.,. 2
:
2- . – %., 1989. – 6. 2.
9.
. .2
.6
. –
%.: ,
"4
", 1999.
10. +
!
. –
%.: ,0+35-%, 2003. – 576 .
-
!
,
. . // +
. – %.: %) ,
&
1984. – ". 60–79.
2. +
&
-
#
2
#
Milovanova L.A. Personal functions in the structure of the language perconality // Vestnik of Volgograd State Medical University. – 2005. – - 1. – P. 91–94.
. / 159.9:301
-
:
. .
+ 0
:
(5.0. 4
,
, –
,
,
).
-
. (
–
,
,
#
&
,
,
#
"
-
,. .
-
%.
[1].
,
,
,
,
,
.
. 6
-
#
.
, "
:
&
94
)
,
"
"
" ().$.
-
,
,
&
,
"
"
&
"
)
,
"
"
#
,
3 #
",
" .
". )
,
#
. 6
.
-
,
. )
"
(%.%. 7
#
"
#
).
! -